Re: [AMRadio] AM Windows!

2007-04-04 Thread Geoff/W5OMR
Jim Wilhite wrote: Whatever you do, plan on next Fall and Winter. But in the meantime listen for the 3.870 group along the West Coast. Anyone would be happy to make contact with someone in your territory. I haven't worked Washington on AM since my early days. 73 Jim W5JO Really? Seems I

Re: [AMRadio] AM Windows!

2007-04-04 Thread Jim Wilhite
Since the band expansion some people have been moving about some. Not nearly as much as I would like to see, but there are places where AM turns up. One of the disadvantages you have in trying to work back into he Central US is the time zone. You will overlap us from about 8 your time until

Re: [AMRadio] AM Windows!

2007-04-04 Thread Jim Wilhite
Well not really hiding Todd. All the descriptions that have been mentioned took a toll on us so we did something. We run in spurts because of weather now. I had storms in the area for 3 straight days then Brian had the pleasure. So we haven't been on in the past few days. Also Brian is of

Re: [AMRadio] AM Windows!

2007-04-04 Thread Bob Macklin
Todd comments: <> I think the point has been made. I assume the AM community is a friendly group. It would be nice to know where and when to look for the activity. For 40M the area is not very larg. byt for 80/75 thiereis a lot of space to cover. Bob Macklin K5MYJ Near Seattle, Wa "Real Radios

Re: [AMRadio] AM Windows!

2007-04-04 Thread Todd, KA1KAQ
On 4/4/07, Jim Wilhite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bob what I am urging is that some of us move from those calling frequencies to other areas where you can operate. There are a couple of guys here that I like to talk to and one is a general. We meet on 3.890 and move to an open frequency near 3.8

Re: [AMRadio] AM Windows!

2007-04-04 Thread Bob Macklin
I said: <> I meant 3870! that's another problem with being an OF! OTOH, 3780 probably is a clear frequency most of the time! A week or so ago W1AW was making in here on both 80M and 40M every eveing. But not this week. And when it was I was not bright enough to try the know AM frequencies. Bob

Re: [AMRadio] AM Windows!

2007-04-04 Thread Bob Macklin
vince ka1iic comments: <> I am not trying to say you should not move. My only problem is that when you move to the Extra segment you exculed some of us. And it is best if you are just waiting for activity, to monitor the publised(established) calling frequency. If you have other established work

Re: [AMRadio] AM Windows!

2007-04-04 Thread Bob Macklin
Jim W5JO comments: <> That's what they call us. I guess we were lucky to start this hobby during the best solar cycle on record. I did not know it was that good at the time. People here in the States were working people in Austrailia with 5W on 10M! I have no problem with people moving out of th

Re: [AMRadio] AM Windows!

2007-04-04 Thread Vince Werber
Kudos Pete... I consider any phone frequency that is allowed by my license as an AM window when I am using the AM mode... anybody that has worked for their license class should use said license to it's fullest degree within the rules and regs... Being held to any frequency because of its mo

Re: [AMRadio] AM Windows!

2007-04-04 Thread Jim Wilhite
Bob what I am urging is that some of us move from those calling frequencies to other areas where you can operate. There are a couple of guys here that I like to talk to and one is a general. We meet on 3.890 and move to an open frequency near 3.825 - 35 several times a week. Too bad you don'

Re: [AMRadio] AM Windows!

2007-04-04 Thread Bob Macklin
Responding to Petes, wa2cwa comments: I have no problem with people moving into the new area to get away from the other problems.It just exculdes thos of us with General tickets. I would think the thing to do is to use the AM message boards to establish new frequencies to call or monitor. Just s

Re: [AMRadio] AM Windows!

2007-04-04 Thread Peter Markavage
As Jim points out, you don't even have to go to the newly expanded portions of 75. I haven't spent any real significant time around 3885 in quite a long time to make AM contacts. I roll down to between 3820 and 3850, find a clear slot, and call a CQ. Lots of abundant AM contacts for folks who have

Re: [AMRadio] AM Windows!

2007-04-04 Thread Bob Macklin
Jim W5JO comments: <> I passed the General exam in 1957. At that time it was all RADIO theory. I looked at the Extra question pool a couple years ago and lost interest. There is too much compter stuff and satalite stuff. I did not see it worth my my while for the kind of operating I wanted to do.

Re: [AMRadio] AM Windows!

2007-04-04 Thread Jim Wilhite
Bob, the General Class can operate down to 3.8. Some activity between 3.8 and 3.880 would be good. The practical answer is to make contact between 3.880 to 3.890 then move either down or up to an open frequency. Jim W5JO Just a comment about where to operate. By sticking to the establis

Re: [AMRadio] AM Windows!

2007-04-04 Thread Todd, KA1KAQ
On 4/4/07, Bob Macklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: By sticking to the established AM windows you leave more opertunity to those of us only holding General class tickets. No one has advocated giving up use of any particular frequency, merely expanding our horizons. Those who have operated below

Re: [AMRadio] AM Windows!

2007-04-04 Thread Geoff/W5OMR
Bob Macklin wrote: Just a comment about where to operate. By sticking to the established AM windows you leave more opertunity to those of us only holding General class tickets. Moving your operations down to the new territory recently opened up by the band realignment limits your activity to

[AMRadio] AM Windows!

2007-04-04 Thread Bob Macklin
Just a comment about where to operate. By sticking to the established AM windows you leave more opertunity to those of us only holding General class tickets. Moving your operations down to the new territory recently opened up by the band realignment limits your activity to Extra class and Advan