On 9 Dec 2005 at 21:28, peter markavage wrote:
Having control is good, sort of like bandwidth limitations.
A supposedly benevolent dictator is not much better than a
malevolent one.
He is still a dictator. We apparently now have a small
group running ARRggghL against the flow and
trying to
peter markavage wrote:
Geoff:
I think you're missing the point here.
I don't. But tha'ts enough out of me, on this.
VJB stated: Too bad that system has been discredited by the laundry list
of bad moves that could have been avoided by the leadership in Newington,
had they only alllowed popular opinion and asked some people for guidance
on what they should do.
(Um, BEFORE they go and do it, not as a blind email
How many amateurs did you solicit comments from before you submitted your
proposal? I see your proposal has a section on views considered from
QRZ postings, but did you really go out and solicit comments and
reactions to your tentative proposal before you issued it? I see no
record of that.
Geoff:
I think you're missing the point here.
VJB said: Thanks for your thoughts. I'm totally with you on the need for
Newington to poll its constituents BEFORE acting on a major policy or
regulatory proposal like this one.
cut
Too bad that system has been discredited by the laundry list of bad
5 matches
Mail list logo
