Re: [AMRadio] RE: Contest signal reports

2007-10-02 Thread w9gt
Pete, You edited out much of my comment in your responseso my remarks appear somewhat out of context. I reiterate, I am not defending or justifying the practice, or in any way saying that signal reports are needed (or even wanted) in contest exchanges. I was merely stating what I know to

Re: [AMRadio] RE: Contest signal reports

2007-10-02 Thread Peter Markavage
Like a lot of things in amateur radio, this old tradition has no real value in contesting. And, in contests where a signal report is still required, whether you say 5-9, 599, 4-5, or 6-9, the challenge of "getting the message through" hasn't been removed. As I said in a previous message, most conte

Re: [AMRadio] RE: Contest signal reports

2007-10-02 Thread Todd, KA1KAQ
On 10/2/07, D. Chester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't recall it always being that way. I seem to remember that once upon > a time it was standard procedure to give a real signal report, particularly > for Field Day, and I seem to recall that Sweepstakes used a serial number > that simulated

Re: [AMRadio] RE: Contest signal reports

2007-10-02 Thread Ellen Rugowski
io in the Amateur Service" Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 6:02 AM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] RE: Contest signal reports > The reason for the signal report requirement is simple, while it might seem redundant, unnecessary or just a distortion of reality when everyone is 5-9 or 599. The mea

Re: [AMRadio] RE: Contest signal reports

2007-10-02 Thread w9gt
The reason for the signal report requirement is simple, while it might seem redundant, unnecessary or just a distortion of reality when everyone is 5-9 or 599. The measure or definition of the minimum requirement for a valid 2-way contact has always been the exchange of callsigns and signal rep

Re: [AMRadio] RE: Contest signal reports

2007-10-02 Thread Peter Markavage
Sweepstakes Exchange in this order: Consecutive serial number (1, 2, 3, etc.; Precedence - Q, A, B, U, M, S (qrp, low power, high power, unlimited, multi-op, school); your call; last two digits of the first year licensed; ARRL Section. Field Day Exchange: Field Day Operating Class; ARRL Section S

[AMRadio] RE: Contest signal reports

2007-10-01 Thread D. Chester
I don't recall it always being that way. I seem to remember that once upon a time it was standard procedure to give a real signal report, particularly for Field Day, and I seem to recall that Sweepstakes used a serial number that simulated a message preamble and that part of the exchange was t