At 04:48 PM 9/11/2004 +, you wrote:
Thank you to everyone who responded via postings and private e-mails.
... He mentioned
that he had a 20-foot shipping container's worth of the equipment
sitting in his warehouse, the business owner would love to get rid of!
...
He is planning to move t
I should(?) know something by monday evening.
73,
Mark C.
--- Donald Chester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Thank you to everyone who responded via postings and private
> e-mails.
> ... He mentioned
> >that he had a 20-foot shipping container's worth of the equipment
> >sitting in hi
Thank you to everyone who responded via postings and private e-mails.
... He mentioned
that he had a 20-foot shipping container's worth of the equipment
sitting in his warehouse, the business owner would love to get rid of!
...
He is planning to move to Eastern Tennessee in the not too dista
Anything worth saving is worth converting, or is it the other way??
I have plenty of 160 AM gear but if there are any small ones left over,
I am interested also. Xtal control makes great mobil radio for getting
local activity started. 73 All Charlie, K0NG ..
Quoting Rbethman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Well, Jim is a VERY good friend of mine.
That said, I'd be interested in a small number of these radios.
So tell him to get that container open, and let's get them out to see
light of day. You never know how many will go!
Bob - N0DGN
James M. Walker wrote:
Mark,
As for my ideas, NOTHING i
Hi Dennis,
A few minutes ago I forewarded your e-mailed the chap in San Pedro.
73,
Mark C.KB4CVN
> Mark,
>
> Care to pass contact information along? Myself and some of my
> friends out
> here would be glad to find homes for these rigs.
>
> Dennis D. W7QHO
> Glendale, CA
Mark,
As for my ideas, NOTHING is absolutely perfect in radio or anything
else.
Having said that, I think that with a judicious cross section of ideas
the units you describe could be resurrected in a reasonable way, to A)
get them back into operation, and B) convert them to usable range for
160 wor
onics.
Regards,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 11:04 AM
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Converting old 1.8-4.0 MHz AM Marine Radios
In a message dated 9/10/04 8:25:43 AM, [
In a message dated 9/10/04 8:25:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> One of my customers (...and an old ham friend) is the senior tech at
> large marine dealer/service shop in Southern California. The other day
> while discussing a technical issue with a radio we got chatting about 2
> MHz marine
WOW !!!
Thank you to everyone who responded via postings and private e-mails.
In answer to Jim's [WB2FCN], I don't have any data on the radios...yet.
Let me explain:
I work in the land mobile two-way radio field as a Product Support
Engineer & Master Technician at the factory in Lynchbu
I have a Simpsom 55 which I hope to have operational on 160m soon.There was
an article in the late 1970's in 73 Mag about general conversion info on
these radios to 160 or 75.
Joe Crawford W4AAB
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cobbeldick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 0
Mark
I remember seeing an article somewhere. Maybe Electric Radio Mag
some
time ago or possibly an old QST about converting marine radio's for 160m.
I'll try to look but someone else may remember in the mean time. I have an
ols Simpson 45 I held on to for just that purpose
Hi Mark,
First yes I believe it is worthwhile because it gets them on the air and not
in the dump! I have an old Hallicrafters AM aircraft transmitter I want to
put on 75m just because I can. I bet I won't find very many more of them on
the air.
As a side note do you have any manuals on Collins
Mark,
Do you have any photos of the rf section, and are they tube type or
solid state? I may be able to offer some suggestions if I could see what
you have to work with. What types of tubes, power devices are in them? I
have modified several different types of equipment (military &
commercial)
and
14 matches
Mail list logo
