hate to use it.
Brett
N2DTS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Carter
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 11:33 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: RE: Re: [AMRadio] Antenna's..
I had one of the Alpha
Subject: RE: Re: [AMRadio] Antenna's..
I had one of the Alpha Delta 40 80 and a multi band Alpha
Delta dipoles. With a tuner, the multi band was one of the
best dummy loads I've ever had. The 80 / 40 trapless dipole
was 'eh' on 80, ok on 40. I now have a 125' dipole, bent all
over he
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Carter
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 1:36 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: RE: Re: [AMRadio] Antenna's..
Hi Brett,
OK, I've never run one before, this is my first 'multi' band.
But I'll clue
you on what I found... I've
] On Behalf Of Craig Carter
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 1:36 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: RE: Re: [AMRadio] Antenna's..
Hi Brett,
OK, I've never run one before, this is my first 'multi' band.
But I'll clue
you on what I found... I've got one half
All this talk about antenna's has me thinking about my setup.
I only have about 100 feet, so something that would work
on 160 and 80 would have to be short.
I used to have a short 80 meter dipole over the
length of the house.
It worked ok, but RF got into everything.
I was thinking about an
I had one of the Alpha Delta 40 80 and a multi band Alpha Delta dipoles. With
a tuner, the multi band was one of the best dummy loads I've ever had. The 80 /
40 trapless dipole was 'eh' on 80, ok on 40. I now have a 125' dipole, bent
all over he!! and gone, and a Heath SA 2060 tuner with RG
6 matches
Mail list logo
