Re: [AMRadio] Transformers Revised

2007-02-20 Thread gkb
Rick: I know you would like to keep it original but even with today's transformers at 120 volts, primary, the secondary still remains the same for filament voltage. Another thing I don't understand at this point, why monitor filament primary voltage? I would think to monitor the true filament

RE: [AMRadio] FS-NOS TV-7 Tube Tester Meters

2007-02-20 Thread Peter Wittenberg
Byron, I have talked to my buddy and he does want the meter. So I assume the shipping cost is the same for three meters for a total of $85...is that correct? Best 73's Peter K2LRC www.k2lrc.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Byron Tatum

Re: [AMRadio] FS-NOS TV-7 Tube Tester Meters

2007-02-20 Thread Byron Tatum
Yes Peter- So I will be shipping three meters to you instead of two. The shipping will be the same. Thank you and I have three meters reserved for you. Thanks. - Original Message - From: Peter Wittenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service'

[AMRadio] Wanted Replacement Frequency Display Drum for Apache TX-1

2007-02-20 Thread Paul Baldock
I'm looking for a Replacement Frequency Display Drum for Apache TX-1 Thanks Paul __ AMRadio mailing list List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net Help:

Re: [AMRadio] Wanted Replacement Frequency Display Drum for Apache TX-1

2007-02-20 Thread Tom Chesek
KE4MG sells them at his website http://heathbelts.com/dials.htm or on Ebay. It looks like a slightly better price on Ebay. Tom K3TVC - Original Message - From: Paul Baldock [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 9:48 AM Subject: [AMRadio] Wanted

Re: [AMRadio] Transformers Revised

2007-02-20 Thread Rick Brashear
Gary, I sure do appreciate your advice and insight. I agree completely about the monitoring of the secondary instead of the primary filament voltage. I have no idea what GE was thinking other than to save a buck or two by using one volt meter to set the filament on all the tubes instead of

[AMRadio] Filament voltage monitoring

2007-02-20 Thread John Lawson
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Rick Brashear wrote: Gary, I sure do appreciate your advice and insight. I agree completely about the monitoring of the secondary instead of the primary filament voltage. I have no idea what GE was thinking other than to save a buck or two by using one volt meter to

[AMRadio] Contact a member

2007-02-20 Thread Joe Walden
From Joe w5jdy in Okla... I wish to appologize for this subject matter. I have been trying to contact Gary Brown at [EMAIL PROTECTED] to see about some paper caps I have for re-stuffing. I have emailed two or three times with no answer. Maybe he will read this and contact me at [EMAIL

Re: [AMRadio] W5OMR Viking II fixed?

2007-02-20 Thread ARS W5OMR
On 2/19/07, ronnie.hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: probably just a loose nut between the chair and microphone LOL Hey! I RESEMBLE That remark! ;-) just joking.. Geoff is a good friend, I gotta jab at him every once in a while!! Trust me, he gets it right back, too! Alas, Ronnie had me sign

[AMRadio] 100 V filament transformer primary

2007-02-20 Thread John Lyles
The reason that manufacturers install 100 V primary transformers, then add a rheostat in front of it, is to allow some lattitude to adjust a filament +/- around the nominal value. When the tube is old and emission starved, the filament primary can be jacked up a few % this way, and the tube

Re: [AMRadio] 100 V filament transformer primary

2007-02-20 Thread Rick Brashear
Hi John, I suspected as much as to why they used the 100 volt primaries. I also figured they were saving money by using only one meter for all the filament monitoring. That's risky business to say the least. In the case of the BT-20-A I have it may have been a contributing factor in the

Re: [AMRadio] 100 V filament transformer primary

2007-02-20 Thread gkb
If a variac is used at 120 volts, you can get 140 volts out of it, guess it depends on the variac connections. So, that kinda shoots that theory down. Regards, Gary...WZ1M - Original Message - From: John Lyles [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Re: [AMRadio] Transformers Revised

2007-02-20 Thread D. Chester
The idea is to be able to compensate for low line voltage. The filament xfmrs are fed from the 115 volt line through a rheostat to 100 volt primary. In case of low line voltage just decrease the resistance in the rheostat and you can bring filament voltage, which is somewhat critical with

Re: [AMRadio] 100 V filament transformer primary

2007-02-20 Thread Rick Brashear
So true... but then you could use just anybody's tranny! HI Rick gkb wrote: If a variac is used at 120 volts, you can get 140 volts out of it, guess it depends on the variac connections. So, that kinda shoots that theory down. Regards, Gary...WZ1M -

Re: [AMRadio] Transformers Revised

2007-02-20 Thread Rick Brashear
It's been a while since I fiddled with the 610-E, but it seems I remember they had all 115 vac primaries instead of the 100 volts as does GE. I could be wrong, I'd have to pull the schematic. Rick/K5IZ D. Chester wrote: The idea is to be able to compensate for low line voltage. The

[AMRadio] Anyone around

2007-02-20 Thread Jim Wilhite
I haven't received any messages in a couple of days. Has the end of the earth occurred and I missed it? Jim W5JO __ AMRadio mailing list List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Partner Website:

Re: [AMRadio] 100 V filament transformer primary

2007-02-20 Thread Bob Bruhns
A rheostat is cheaper and smaller than a variac, offers a softer start on the filament, and because of the temperature coefficient of the filament, there is a small reduction in filament voltage variation over line voltage fluctuations, although that isn't much. A rheostat generates more heat,

Re: [AMRadio] Anyone around

2007-02-20 Thread ars.w5omr
Jim Wilhite wrote: I haven't received any messages in a couple of days. Has the end of the earth occurred and I missed it? Jim W5JO working fine here in new orleans. -- 73 = Best Regards W5OMR/5 __ AMRadio mailing list List Home:

Re: [AMRadio] Anyone around

2007-02-20 Thread Bob Bruhns
(Replying throuh the reflector and direct to sender manually) Jim - the list has been active lately, and your query came through. I think a spam filter is blocking it somewhere at your end. Bacon, WA3WDR __ AMRadio mailing list List

Re: [AMRadio] Low modulation

2007-02-20 Thread SBJohnston
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Try applying 122VAC to the secondary through a 1K, 20 watt power resistor. The voltage to the windings should not drop much from the no-resistor readings. Thanks for the suggestion. There was little difference with a resistor in series, however, so still not

Re: [AMRadio] Low modulation

2007-02-20 Thread SBJohnston
Don, thank you very much for the great ideas on testing my Gates mod transformer and reactor using the HV supply in the transmitter. I'll hopefully get back to it again in day or two and we'll see what the results are. Steve WD8DAS ** Check out free