[amsat-bb] Re: A word of caution - Hygain DB-218SAT Sat Antenna's

2009-05-11 Thread Jim Shorney
On Mon, 11 May 2009 07:31:48 +0200, Allan Saul wrote: >First of all, as supplied by Hy-Gain, these switches >could never work by design. This is not your grandfather's HyGain. MFJ bought the tooling and designs, but not the brains, from Telex. The old crew would not make mistakes like that. I

[amsat-bb] Re: Cleaning oxidation from antenna

2009-07-09 Thread Jim Shorney
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:42:33 -0700 (GMT-07:00), Clint Bradford wrote: >>> ... Nothing seems to be pitted or deteriorated, just "ugly". > >Fine steel wool. I have been told that steel wool is NOT a good thign to use, because tiny particles will embed themselves in the aluminum and subsequently ru

[amsat-bb] Re: ITU Phonetics - Kilo

2011-04-10 Thread Jim Shorney
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 12:34:48 -0700 (PDT), Glen Zook wrote: >That is why geographical names work better when working DX. For stateside >use, at least in my opinion, the ICAO phonetics are definitely recommended. I've had this happen to me enough to be more than just coincidence. Repeating my cal

[amsat-bb] Re: The Need for Phonetics

2011-04-10 Thread Jim Shorney
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 17:52:37 -0700, Jeff Moore wrote: >This is a bunch of baloney! > >Stick to the standard and it will work fine. Experience trumps experts. I have a friend who's name went into the log as "Dred" because a South American ham kept hearing "Golf" as "Dog". So much for standards.

[amsat-bb] Re: The Need for Phonetics

2011-04-11 Thread Jim Shorney
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:17:49 -0700, Jeff Moore wrote: ><== Could it be that they understand the quicksand you're standing on? No. We know from long experience (35+ years in my case) that Glen is right. 73 -Jim -- Ham Radio NU0C Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.S.A. TR7/RV7/R7A/L7, TR6/RV6, T4XC/R4C/L

[amsat-bb] Re: ""you may as well use Skype..."

2011-02-04 Thread Jim Shorney
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 08:03:59 +, Gordon JC Pearce wrote: >It doesn't in my case. I have *no interest at all* in operating >satellites that require a complex fixed station with computer tracking >and tuning. None. Doesn't interest me one bit. Require? Hah. I used to run the RS birds with a T

[amsat-bb] Re: ""you may as well use Skype..."

2011-02-05 Thread Jim Shorney
On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 08:41:18 +, Gordon JC Pearce wrote: > >You're so far south you can get away with that, though ;-) I have never thought of Nebraska as "south", y'all. :) 73 -Jim -- Ham Radio NU0C Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.S.A. TR7/RV7/R7A/L7, TR6/RV6, T4XC/R4C/L4B, NCL2000, SB104A, R

[amsat-bb] Re: ME

2011-12-03 Thread Jim Shorney
On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 14:50:17 -0800, Kevin Deane wrote: >How dare you post my personal email on this BB! By doing so you have crossed >any line I may have ever even thought about so good job there buddy. Rule #1 of email: Never type anything in email to anyone that you would not want to become pu

[amsat-bb] Re: ME

2011-12-03 Thread Jim Shorney
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 20:23:28 -0800, Clint Bradford wrote: >>> ... Rule #1 of email ... > >No - the first "rule" of email is to respect the intent of the writer - and >not post publicly what was intended as a private communication. > >Not sure of one's intent? ASK before posting elsewhere. > >Anyt

[amsat-bb] Re: 2 Meter TV Interference

2011-12-07 Thread Jim Shorney
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 16:48:49 -0500, Charles Suprin wrote: >I didn't think there were any vhf stations left. All the numbers on the >channels now are virtual. All the tv antenna plans are for uhf bands. A >quick look in the Boston market and the lowest channel is 19, channel >2@500MHz. Are there pla