Kevin:
I don't think that the OP was trying to complain about SSB operators being
less capable or less polite or less facile in their Doppler tuning
correction or whatever in comparison to CW operators. He was just making an
observation that sometimes two pairs of communicating operators have
As long as AMSAT-NA needs to concentrate on 1U/3U/6U Cubesats for the
immediatee future, I would really like to see the pursuit of linear
transponders on them instead of single-channel FM repeaters. The way I see
it, launch opportunities are so rare that we ought to fly the most capable
equipme
I did a search for "Amsat Droid" and was directed to Droid Sat (wrong
program). Then I did a search for "Amsat" and was directed to AmsatDroid
(all one word). Maybe that was your problem, or as David wrote, maybe you
were just so "quick on the draw" that Google Play wasn't ready for you yet.
Bu
I am not aware of such an app for the Android platform, at least not for
artificial communications satellites.
Google Sky Map will do that for the Moon, but "Oscar Zero" moves through
the sky much more slowly than the Ham sats (as you well know). And even
though having the phone point you to a
Note that Jan is specifically asking about VO-52 (mode UV), *NOT* FO-29
(mode VU). There is a big difference. When the uplink is VHF, the third
harmonic of 145 MHz is 435 MHz so desense is often a problem. I have always
noticed that difficulty with my FT-847 on FO-29 in the absence of external
Kevin:
I'm wondering if there is some other criteria besides UHF (I presume in the
430-440 MHz band) and 100-200 watts out and linear operation? Because there
are many amps that meet those criteria.
If you want brand new, you can find them from Mirage (not my first choice,
our repeater club
On Oct 21 2012, R Oler wrote:
The gear for the linear birds is not all that much more expensive then FM
equipment. BUT if you dont use it for the birds and dont have really good
antenna arrays it is more or less not of a lot of use. The same could be
said in spades for some gear that will do
On Jun 22 2012, Keith Baker wrote:
Is it me, my keps or my equipmentor did I hear VO-52 in Mode J this
(Friday AM) in a pass over the USA?
73,
Keith BakerKB1SF / VA3KSF
I dont't know, but I usually have zero trouble working VO-52 during Field
Day, but this year I never hear
David:
You failed to quote the most fascinating part of the article:
The caution is well advised. Statistics show that some two-thirds of the
rockets introduced in the past 20 years have had an unsuccessful first
outing.
It is for this reason that the satellites carried on the "qualificatio
On Oct 18 2011, Bob- W7LRD wrote:
With the occasional conversations going on with leo, nano sat, GEO, cube
sat, heo, etc. Just what does it cost to put these gizzmos up there?
Who are the major players who do the putting? More and more countries and
private companies are developing this ca
On Apr 15 2011, R Oler wrote:
>
There are LOTS of reasons that the bird could have failed, in my viewpoint
the BEST one is that the battery has some issues. Operating the vehicle in
a thermal environment that it was not designed for would be a first guess,
followed by some sort of "crib death"
On Feb 18 2011, zach hillerson wrote:
I purchased a Yaesu 847 for both satellite and HF work. Since this is my
1st base-style transceiver I am now in need of a power supply. I was
originally considering the Astron RS35M and am curious if linear or
switching is the proper choice? Is there a
On May 17 2010, Edward R Cole wrote:
>At 02:38 PM 5/17/2010, tosca...@umn.edu wrote:
>>
>>Here's a thought: buy two SoftRocks for a lot less than the price of the
>>Flex 5000 -- one would be the v6.3Rx/Tx and the other could be the V9 Rx
>> only.
>Huh? Why? Put a xvtr for the uplink band on the
On May 16 2010, Sebastian wrote:
> Perhaps others such as DEMI, will see this as an opportunity and come up
> with alternatives?
Well, keep in mind that DEMI's strength is in transverters, and what is
hard to obtain for satellite operation from most common-place existing
equipment is a full-du
On Apr 23 2010, Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF wrote:
>Perhaps we should stick to the unambiguous exponential/scientific notation.
>Today's date is 2.01E3:4E0:2.3E1
>
>On 23-Apr-10 11:50, Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:
>>
>> If you really want to bang your head against the wall at how man can't
>> agree on a
Domenico: I suspect that the difference of opinion has to do with the
difference in punctuation (',' vs. '.') used with large numbers.
In typical American usage,
243,902,443 Million Watts = 243,902,443,000,000 watts = 243.9 trillion watts
243.902 443 million watts = 243,902,443 watts = 24
Well, I'm so busy at work that I have not been able to keep up with the
news like I used to, but I seem to recall that the folks up there in space
are kept awfully busy with scheduled activities, and that if that wasn't
bad enough, they were talking about adding another EVA to fix a stuck valve
On Apr 1 2010, Idle-Tyme wrote:
>the best was neither vert or horizontal, and continously changing, well
>slowly changing faraday rotation. plus why would you want to aste n
>extra 3 db if you have it to be used?
>
>Joe WB9SBD
>On 4/1/2010 2:27 PM, Mark Lunday wrote:
>> Would this also be acco
On Mar 27 2010, Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield wrote:
>Has anyone bought and played with one of these ultra cheap WOUXUN dual band
> hand helds that are selling on eBay? Do they hear well enough for
> satellite
>operation?
>
>73,
>Joe kk0sd
I have zero first-hand experience, but according to...
http://
Does the US government NOT have any plans to launch any more GPS satellites?
Does the existing array of satellites in orbit have any which are not in
active use, i.e. reserved for future use as backups? As I recall, each
satellite has two different atomic standards on board, one is on and the
o
On Oct 15 2009, Edward Cole wrote:
>So, IF the battery un-shorts, IF the IHU boots
>and resets the beacon (S-band, I
>assume). Therefore, for the rest of us,
>occasional monitoring the beacon frequency would
>be good (using the current keps to estimate
>Doppler offset). IF detected, then co
On Oct 15 2009, Rocky Jones wrote:
>
>http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0910/15dscovr/index.html
>
>Robert WB5MZO
Hmmm... from the article cited:
"designed to keep a constant vigil on the planet from the L1 libration
point a million miles away"
Gee, that's about 11 seconds for your echo to retu
On Jul 2 2009, kd8...@aol.com wrote:
> Don't want to get a whole new thing started here but - I don't think we
> ever went to the moon in 1969 and I don't think we will ever goto the
> moon - in 2012 or whenever they proposed a "return" to the moon
With that level of disbelief I can certainly s
23 matches
Mail list logo