Bwahahaha
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:52 PM, JoAnne Maenpaa wrote:
> > ... puppeteer drive in my star ship in a few years
>
> Unfortunately, the Inter-Galactic Traffic in Arms Regulations will
> prevent us from talking about this! ;-)
>
> --
> 73 de JoAnne K9JKM
> k9...@amsat.org
>
>
> __
> ... puppeteer drive in my star ship in a few years
Unfortunately, the Inter-Galactic Traffic in Arms Regulations will
prevent us from talking about this! ;-)
--
73 de JoAnne K9JKM
k9...@amsat.org
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed
Haha! I am sure you and everyone else is right but I really want the
puppeteer drive in my star ship in a few years!
Bob
On Aug 5, 2014 1:09 PM, "Martin Davidoff" wrote:
> Our friends in DL have the perfect word for this: Wunschdenken (wishful
> thinking about an impossibility).
>
> It may be t
It's either fodder for the conspiracy theorists or it'll win a Noble prize.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Mike Lemons wrote:
> It doesn't violate any laws of physics if you are expending power from
> photovoltaics to propel your spacecraft.
>
> For example, you could push against the Earth's
It doesn't violate any laws of physics if you are expending power from
photovoltaics to propel your spacecraft.
For example, you could push against the Earth's magnetic field to get a
satellite into a higher orbit.
This article seems to confirm this model, although they don't know what
they
Hi, Marty!!
Suggest sticking to the Annals of Improbable Research (AIR). See:
http://www.improbable.com. It’s all real, vetted, and celebrated by awarding
of the IgNobel prizes every year. This year will be the 24th First Annual
IgNobel Prize Ceremony and Lectures, See your AIRheads in acti
Our friends in DL have the perfect word for this: Wunschdenken (wishful
thinking about an impossibility).
It may be time to start some new scientific/engineering publications --
The Journal of Premature Publication;
The Journal of Retractions and Corrections.
k2ubc
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:56
Non-Newtonian reactionless drives have been a staple in science fiction, and
the goal to make space
travel truly practical. Probably the most famous was the "Dean Drive" which
was a purely mechanical
attempt. The thrust claimed has always turned out to be some quirk, usually
obvious after the
Snake oil in space
On Tuesday, 5 August 2014, 0:43, Franklin Antonio
wrote:
At 03:54 PM 8/4/2014, Robert McGwier wrote:
>I hope they aren't wrong because they clearly don't understand how it
>works!!! http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006052
The result is surely wrong.
When measuri
At 03:54 PM 8/4/2014, Robert McGwier wrote:
I hope they aren't wrong because they clearly don't understand how it
works!!! http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006052
The result is surely wrong.
When measuring MICROnewtons, from a device that's going to be getting
very hot (because the mic
How can you tell? They've got enough 10-gallon words in the Abstract to
propel mountains...
Still, I've been wondering if we'll ever find a space propulsion
mechanism that doesn't involve throwing parts of the spacecraft overboard.
Greg KO6TH
Robert McGwier wrote:
I hope they aren't wron
This part made me perk up:
"therefore is potentially demonstrating an interaction with the quantum vacuum
virtual plasma"
I clearly have some reading to do.
73, Drew KO4MA
-Original Message-
>From: Robert McGwier
>Sent: Aug 4, 2014 6:54 PM
>To: amsat bb
>
I hope they aren't wrong because they clearly don't understand how it
works!!!
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006052
Bob
N4HY
--
Bob McGwier
Co-Owner and Technical Director, Federated Wireless, LLC
Professor Virginia Tech
Senior Member IEEE, Facebook: N4HYBob, ARS: N4HY
Faculty Adviso
13 matches
Mail list logo
