> But as far as I'm concerned, it IS NOT the ultimate objective of a
> satellite operator. It is the BARE MINIMUM of satellite operation, and
> there is no way I'm going to be satisfied with that for more than one or
> two passes.
Fair opinion to have, you are entitled to it. However, stating it t
On 07/22/2014 04:09 PM, Kevin M wrote:
But as far as I'm concerned, it IS NOT the ultimate objective of a
>satellite operator. It is the BARE MINIMUM of satellite operation, and
>there is no way I'm going to be satisfied with that for more than one or
>two passes.
Fair opinion to have, you are
Hi Gus!
You would have been happy with how AMSAT presented satellite
operating at the ARRL Centennial Convention that just concluded
in Hartford over the weekend. We had a day-long training seminar
last Thursday (17 July), and we touched on the extremes for stations
capable of satellite operating
On 07/22/2014 07:11 PM, Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) wrote:
You would have been happy with how AMSAT presented satellite
operating at the ARRL Centennial Convention that just concluded
in Hartford over the weekend.
Sounds like a great party! I know it wouldn't have been easy to set up,
and
