[amsat-bb] Re: Field Day mode for AO-51

2010-05-05 Thread Tim Cunningham
> I have a couple questions: > > 1. The folks who can't eek out a contact with the handheld and Arrow > during > Field Day, have you practiced? It's how I have done it the last couple of > years without that much trouble, patience and timing are the keys :-). We > have a good Field Day location

[amsat-bb] Re: Field Day mode for AO-51

2010-05-05 Thread Luc Leblanc
On 4 May 2010 at 22:22, Gary "Joe" Mayfield wrote: Date sent: Tue, 04 May 2010 22:22:54 -0500 From: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Field Day mode for AO-51 Copies to: amsat-bb@amsat.org &

[amsat-bb] Re: Field Day mode for AO-51

2010-05-04 Thread Gary "Joe" Mayfield
er Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 4:33 PM To: Ng, Peter Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org; ao51-mo...@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Field Day mode for AO-51 Ng, Peter wrote: > ...sorry, I meant to vote for V/U mode as I only have VHF/UHF equipment! > > Keep in mind there will likely be three or

[amsat-bb] Re: Field Day mode for AO-51

2010-05-04 Thread Mark Hammond N8MH
arce Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 19:30:57 To: Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Field Day mode for AO-51 On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 07:20 -0500, Alan P. Biddle wrote: > Peter, > > >From past studies, mode L/U is the place to be if you want to work someone > on AO-51 without an EME station. ;) Whil

[amsat-bb] Re: Field Day mode for AO-51

2010-05-04 Thread Ron Overdrive
Agreed. Sure your arm gets tired after a long pass from satellites like HO-68, but half the fun is the simplicity and the other half being the challenge. I doubt I would personally get involved with L/U on LEO's like AO-51 because of the cost and complexity of having computer controlled servos to t

[amsat-bb] Re: Field Day mode for AO-51

2010-05-04 Thread Andrew Glasbrenner
> Presumably that's because very few people have L- and S-band equipment. > I'm guessing that many people are - like me - put off by the prohibitive > cost and requirement for overcomplicated tracking systems. > > Working V/U with a handheld antenna is much more fun than sitting > watching a compu

[amsat-bb] Re: Field Day mode for AO-51

2010-05-04 Thread Gordon JC Pearce
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 07:20 -0500, Alan P. Biddle wrote: > Peter, > > >From past studies, mode L/U is the place to be if you want to work someone > on AO-51 without an EME station. ;) While the V/U FM repeater was choked > on every pass, there were very few stations on L/U. In the four passes I

[amsat-bb] Re: Field Day mode for AO-51

2010-05-04 Thread Alan P. Biddle
Peter, >From past studies, mode L/U is the place to be if you want to work someone on AO-51 without an EME station. ;) While the V/U FM repeater was choked on every pass, there were very few stations on L/U. In the four passes I monitored last year, totaling 46 minutes, there were only 21 stati

[amsat-bb] Re: Field Day mode for AO-51

2010-05-03 Thread Ng, Peter
Hi Drew, thanks very much for your feedback! Guess I was too naïve earlier, but now see the light! :) Also after reading threads from Robert and Mark, I agree, there might be too much non-productive traffic and high expectations, especially on FD. I will stick to receive only as Mark suggeste

[amsat-bb] Re: Field Day mode for AO-51

2010-05-03 Thread Andrew Glasbrenner
Ng, Peter wrote: > ...sorry, I meant to vote for V/U mode as I only have VHF/UHF equipment! > > Keep in mind there will likely be three or four transponders birds, and two to four other FM birds available that weekend! It's been my perception that a good portion of AMSAT's sustaining members