[amsat-bb] Re: SO-50, IC-910H, and Sat PC32 Issues

2013-09-19 Thread Paul Stoetzer
Les, I believe I am one of the callers that you never got back to on a pass a couple of weeks ago! SO-50's frequency seems to be shifted down by about 5 kHz from the published downlink. What does your Doppler.sqf say? 73, Paul, N8HM On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Les Rayburn wrote: > Befo

[amsat-bb] Re: SO-50, IC-910H, and Sat PC32 Issues

2013-09-19 Thread Andrew Glasbrenner
SO-50 uses a corner mounted single UHF whip for the downlink, so it is linearly polarized, and is often shielded by the body of the spacecraft. It also runs about 250mw, which is pretty low. By comparision FO-29 is circularly polarized. Operating portable on SO-50 it is extremely beneficial to b

[amsat-bb] Re: SO-50, IC-910H, and Sat PC32 Issues

2013-09-19 Thread Kevin M
Adding to Drew's comments... A.) Reception is poor. Especially high elevation passes.  Yep I hear SO-50 better with an IO antenna mounted on my HT sitting  in the shack than with my fixed elevation yagis mounted outside  when the bird is overhead. I can twist and turn the HT to match the bird E