On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:36:14 -0500
"Bob Bruninga" wrote:
> It's not a sync problem. All the images are properly framed. Just not good
> images even though the signal strength sounds Q5 to me.. Just enough noise
> in all of them to be not worth looking at. Ill keep watching... Bob,
> WB4APR
It's not a sync problem. All the images are properly framed. Just not good
images even though the signal strength sounds Q5 to me.. Just enough noise
in all of them to be not worth looking at. Ill keep watching... Bob,
WB4APR
>> ALl the rest you can tell MAYBE that it is some kind of picutre
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 17:47:40 -0500 (EST)
"Bob Bruninga " wrote:
> ALl the rest you can tell MAYBE that it is some kind of picutre with maybe
> some text at the top and the bottom, but NONE of them have been readable.
> Yet, the signals sound like they would make a Q5 599 SSB signal. Is it jus
I have copied and worked LOTS of SSTV stations on 20
meters. And some were not all that strong. There is a lot of QRM,
doubling, people talking on SSB, etc etc on 14.230.
We also did some SSTV on AO-51 a while back and I got some
good pictures there, too.
Here are a couple of 20M ones at
> Jeff, KB8VCO and I were successful in transmitting
> a picture and receiving back an image via the
> ARISSat-1/RADIOSKAF-V transponder.
By the way, once I got MMSTV loaded I decided to just park it on 14.230 MHz all
day long and watch the SSTV images come rolling in. I have been watching the
Hi Farrell,
great post and congratulations.
I am currently having fun with the 1000BPSK telemetry.
Next experinment will be a QSO through the transponder.
Its good to have a satellite that presents a few challenges.
I echo your thanks to the entire ARISSat team.
73 John G7HIA
___