[amsat-bb] Re: Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967?

2011-02-23 Thread Rocky Jones
It would be nice to have an Oscar IV or an Arsene working! Robert Oler WB5MZO From: domenico.i8...@tin.it To: orbit...@hotmail.com; g7...@btinternet.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967? Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 06:16:47 +0100

[amsat-bb] Re: Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967?

2011-02-23 Thread Rocky Jones
Steve. thank you for your gentle corrections and you are right. Should have remembered that better Robert G. Oler WB5MZO Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 23:19:45 -0600 From: melac...@verizon.net To: orbit...@hotmail.com; g7...@btinternet.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: Re: Satellite OPS9328

[amsat-bb] Re: Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967?

2011-02-22 Thread i8cvs
- Original Message - From: John Heath g7...@btinternet.com To: Amsat amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 11:58 PM Subject: [amsat-bb] Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967? Just been looking at the tracking site http://www.n2yo.com/satellites Some great stuff on this site and

[amsat-bb] Re: Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967?

2011-02-22 Thread Rocky Jones
By the way it is possible that the downlink frequency was very close to the 2 meters band but I was not able to find any information about the frequency. 73 de i8CVS Domenico ___ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those

[amsat-bb] Re: Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967?

2011-02-22 Thread Rocky Jones
John. Initial defense satellite communications system...The first real communications system that the US military had. YOu can look on the web and get more information...but there is an amateur radio connection. The theory of the satellite constellation was that the satellites were

[amsat-bb] Re: Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967?

2011-02-22 Thread i8cvs
- Original Message - From: Rocky Jones To: domenico.i8...@tin.it ; g7...@btinternet.com ; Amsat BB Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 4:16 AM Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967? By the way it is possible that the downlink frequency was very close