At 07:59 AM 6/28/2011, jerry wrote:
I can see it now , USA Today headlines Ham operator successfully
passes ARRL RadioGram over Orbiting Satellite .
As much trouble and time it takes to pass a message over much
more controlled frequiencies , I could not imagine trying to pass a
formatted
A net could work on a satellite but a net needs to be established and
practiced so when the real emergency happens, the net itself is
routine and focus can be on the emergency. I'm not surprised we don't
have this because of the scarcity of the satellites themselves. While
FM gives the most
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:30:40 -0500
Patrick Green pagr...@gmail.com wrote:
A net could work on a satellite but a net needs to be established and
practiced so when the real emergency happens, the net itself is
routine and focus can be on the emergency.
How about we have some discussion that
On the contrary.
Emcomm is the only thing keeping the government on our side and
protecting the facilities we have.
On 28/06/11 22:45, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
How about we have some discussion that doesn't eventually get forced round to
emergency communications? Emcomms is the cancer that
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:00:30 +0100
Nigel A. Gunn ni...@ngunn.net wrote:
Don't top post, it screws up the flow of conversation
On the contrary.
Emcomm is the only thing keeping the government on our side and
protecting the facilities we have.
It's also generated a huge crowd of amateurs who
