[amsat-bb] Re: Who is using a IC-910 with Maspro Antennas?

2012-11-21 Thread Dimitry Borzenko
Hello Jan. Try Desense filter. More info here - http://www.amsat.org/amsat-new/articles/Mode-J/ Regards. -Original Message- From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of PE0SAT | Amateur Radio Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:12 PM To: Amsat bb

[amsat-bb] Re: Who is using a IC-910 with Maspro Antennas?

2012-11-21 Thread tosca005
Note that Jan is specifically asking about VO-52 (mode UV), *NOT* FO-29 (mode VU). There is a big difference. When the uplink is VHF, the third harmonic of 145 MHz is 435 MHz so desense is often a problem. I have always noticed that difficulty with my FT-847 on FO-29 in the absence of external

[amsat-bb] Re: Who is using a IC-910 with Maspro Antennas?

2012-11-21 Thread PE0SAT | Amateur Radio
Hi Dimitry, I know of this filter, but these are for working FO-29 when the uplink is 145 and the downlink 435. The Harmonics produced by the 145 uplink signal interfere with the 435 downlink. Now I experience the same with VO-52 but there the uplink 435 and the donwlink 145 ??? So why is

[amsat-bb] Re: Who is using a IC-910 with Maspro Antennas?

2012-11-21 Thread Dimitry Borzenko
Hello Guys. Sorry I do not read all message. John right. I have IC-910H and do not have problem under VO-52 operating. But I have small VHF UHF antennas and good SWR. Regards. -Original Message- From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of

[amsat-bb] Re: Who is using a IC-910 with Maspro Antennas?

2012-11-21 Thread GW1FKY
Hi Jan, Sorry to learn of your problems and appears really annoying especially as you have carried out an equipment change. Not trying to teach you as you are an expert with lots of experience in operating amateur radio on many bands and modes. But please consider the following. It is hardly

[amsat-bb] Re: Who is using a IC-910 with Maspro Antennas?

2012-11-21 Thread i8cvs
Hi Jan, PA0SAT Your problem with VO-52 ,uplink 435 MHz and downlink 145 MHz is not due obviously by armonics but by 435 MHz overloading the IC-910 receiving 145 MHz because probably this tranceiver has a lover 1 dB compression point at 144 MHz in comparison to a FT-847 and so it is more subject