I perfectly agree, 0.97 would be nice!
thx Gus for letting us know. I don't remember if the 'skin contest' discussion
was ever finished, but in the
end the decision was that we would drop the contest idea and instead just
design a new skin that would be
aimed at replacing the default one. The
On 10/20/06, Gustavo A. Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> This email is most to inform all devs (KKRT of course you allready know
> now ;)) that Bæåst and Me ([GuS] or GuS-Arg in the forums) we are
> designing a new (pretend to be) Default skin, and using as base the
>
Hi everyone!
This email is most to inform all devs (KKRT of course you
allready know now ;)) that Bæåst and Me ([GuS] or GuS-Arg
in the forums) we are designing a new (pretend to be) Default skin,
and using as base the Emerald-1.0 Skin i made (because i have all SVG
graphics as source
I never say that is "the same". I said that for me is better, like another alternative ;)2006/10/20, NoWhereMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:- Original Message -From: Gustavo A. Díaz2006/10/20, NoWhereMan <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:>>And you can see this in Tk. XUL doesn't support Qt. Ok, but it supports
- Original Message -
From: Gustavo A. Díaz
2006/10/20, NoWhereMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>And you can see this in Tk. XUL doesn't support Qt. Ok, but it supports
>>Gtk.
>>Gtk supports Qt. It's a strange path to get it, but here it is.
>>link: http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?con
2006/10/20, NoWhereMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
And you can see this in Tk. XUL doesn't support Qt. Ok, but it supports Gtk.Gtk supports Qt. It's a strange path to get it, but here it is.link:
http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=9714it truly worksI being usign QTcurve for awhile, and is m
- Original Message -
From: "Harry Vennik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> There are a lot of good things to say about XUL indeed, but there are some
> problems/limitations that kept us from using it for amsn2. If you want to
> know more about that, search the archives for the thread 'XML2GUI' (ca.
- Original Message -
From: "Harry Vennik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mailing list for developers and everyone helping AMSN"
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Amsn-devel] msn python client (msnp13)
> Op vrijdag 20 oktober 2006 14:14, schreef NoWhereMan:
>> OT: I don't
ok, well, let's hope Jerome wil be able to do it, 'cause I don't have time..
another exam monday, then too
much work + studies.. for the next few days/weeks, I'll be a ghost again... at
least with development...
KKRT
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 06:26:02PM +0100, Tom Hennigan wrote:
> Lol thats the
Yes I know I'm the 'only' one for who the integration doesn't apply.. which is
why I say "I can't understand
you", not "you are wrong" :p
btw, I use windows nowadays and I can see the diff, but it's only if we open a
dialog (prefs, blabla) but for
the most part, tk looks nice (I know, the look
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 06:39:15PM +0200, NoWhereMan wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Youness Alaoui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > lol, wasn't gonna say this, but was going to say "this should NOT become a
> > gtk vs. tk thread" :p
>
> sure :p
>
> > i know gtk
> > integrates
Lol thats the correct var :-) However for some reason I'm getting
errors building amsn. I'll leave my server on so if you want youness,
you can try building it. But I need to go out for a meeting now, I'll
be back later on tonight, and I'll give it a shot then.
On 20 Oct 2006, at 15:51, You
Op vrijdag 20 oktober 2006 14:14, schreef NoWhereMan:
> OT: I don't know if I told you; generally speaking of interfaces and
> designing, XUL looks interesting, doesn't it? it's completely skinnable,
> integrates well with all systems, and uses javascript as a scripting
> language (which really is
GTK can be ugly if you use an ugly skin, Tk is not skinnable and is always
ugly... And then there is the integration issue, for which you are nearly the
only one who doesn' t have that problem.
Op vrijdag 20 oktober 2006 01:58, schreef Youness Alaoui:
> beurk, and they say Tk is uglier than GTK.
- Original Message -
From: "Youness Alaoui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> lol, wasn't gonna say this, but was going to say "this should NOT become a
> gtk vs. tk thread" :p
sure :p
> i know gtk
> integrates well in your desktop, but it's not "nicer" than tk if it's not
> well used..
i do
cool.. just make sure you tested it...
a set ::test_webcam_reflector 1] will make it use the refelctor even if you're
not firewalled...
not sure about the varname, verify with grep reflector * | grep test
windows/linux users should also make sure my changes doesn't break anything...
also test
lol, wasn't gonna say this, but was going to say "this should NOT become a gtk
vs. tk thread" :p i know gtk
integrates well in your desktop, but it's not "nicer" than tk if it's not well
used.. and btw, you do see
what difference chameleon does.. and all it does is change some of the dialogs,
- Original Message -
From: "NoWhereMan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
oh, I must add, before than Kakaroto kills me, that I love to be able to
skin aMsn ;)
ha-ha, stopped you from before you could yell "use that damn python-thing,
then!"
:D:D
- Original Message -
From: "Youness Alaoui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> beurk, and they say Tk is uglier than GTK...
> this only proves that our GUI is crap not because of the toolkit we use
> but instead because of the design of
> the GUI...
oh.. really I liked that. I mean... that's plain
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Vivia Nikolaidou wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > it seems we might have had some corrupted data with libmimic, siren and
> > kidhash this might explain if mac users were complaining about weird
> > dots, or corrupted image during webcam sess
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> it seems we might have had some corrupted data with libmimic, siren and
> kidhash this might explain if mac users were complaining about weird
> dots, or corrupted image during webcam session...
I had those too... VERY often the first frame wo
21 matches
Mail list logo
