Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.97.1, 0.98 alpha and aMSN2

2008-05-28 Thread Youness Alaoui
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:28:46PM +0200, Mirko Hansen wrote: > Alright, at first thanks Tom, billiob, Kakaroto and square for your answers. > > > But back to the merging: There are a few commits I noted where I wasn't > > sure > > > wether to merge them or not. So first question to everybody: Is

Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.97.1, 0.98 alpha and aMSN2

2008-05-28 Thread Mirko Hansen
Alright, at first thanks Tom, billiob, Kakaroto and square for your answers. > But back to the merging: There are a few commits I noted where I wasn't > sure > > wether to merge them or not. So first question to everybody: Is 0.97.1 > only > > a bugfix release or a stable release? In my opinion th

Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.97.1, 0.98 alpha and aMSN2

2008-05-28 Thread Youness Alaoui
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:08:37PM +0200, square87 wrote: > 2008/5/28 Youness Alaoui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > 9385 confuses me a bit, it's marked as work in progess, but there is no > > > commit concerning that topic, or I'm simply blind ;) > > > > > > > hehe, yeah, that's square :p I neve

Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.97.1, 0.98 alpha and aMSN2

2008-05-28 Thread square87
2008/5/28 Youness Alaoui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > 9385 confuses me a bit, it's marked as work in progess, but there is no > > commit concerning that topic, or I'm simply blind ;) > > > > hehe, yeah, that's square :p I never know what he's doing.. *ROTFL* > > I think he should be the one to s

Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.97.1, 0.98 alpha and aMSN2

2008-05-28 Thread Youness Alaoui
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 08:47:20PM +0200, Mirko Hansen wrote: > > 9246 > > 9254 > > 9267+9268 > > 9282 > > They were already merged, it's like this in the branch, maybe Harry merged > them before. > Right.. I just checked each one and they were already merged.. but it's not mentioned in the comm

Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.97.1, 0.98 alpha and aMSN2

2008-05-28 Thread Boris Faure (aka billiob)
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Tom Hennigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 9406-9408, 9411 and a few more: tclISF - that's inkdraw, right? Is this some > kind of bugfix or a better way to offer inkdraw? (sorry for the stupid > question, I never used that ...) Should this be merged, too? > > ISF (In

Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.97.1, 0.98 alpha and aMSN2

2008-05-28 Thread Tom Hennigan
On 28 May 2008, at 19:47, Mirko Hansen wrote: 9246 9254 9267+9268 9282 They were already merged, it's like this in the branch, maybe Harry merged them before. 9388 This one doesn't fit to the current code. There is no piece of code in the file gui.tcl like in the diff, so there should b

Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.97.1, 0.98 alpha and aMSN2

2008-05-28 Thread Mirko Hansen
> 9246 > 9254 > 9267+9268 > 9282 They were already merged, it's like this in the branch, maybe Harry merged them before. > > 9388 This one doesn't fit to the current code. There is no piece of code in the file gui.tcl like in the diff, so there should be no need to merge it. > > 9670 There i

[Amsn-devel] Answer this question

2008-05-28 Thread jmiasnikoff
Title: Answer this question Hi, Jesús([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has a question for you! Click your answer: Would you describe [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a:

Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.97.1, 0.98 alpha and aMSN2

2008-05-28 Thread Youness Alaoui
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:30:27PM +0200, Mirko Hansen wrote: > I'll continue now merging where I stopped yesterday. Just had to go to bed > yesterday before falling asleep on my keyboard ;-) > I have one general question: 0.97.1 is a bugfix-release, but should we add > some minor improvements, too

Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.97.1, 0.98 alpha and aMSN2

2008-05-28 Thread Youness Alaoui
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:30:27PM +0200, Mirko Hansen wrote: > I'll continue now merging where I stopped yesterday. Just had to go to bed > yesterday before falling asleep on my keyboard ;-) np :) I heard something about humans needing to sleep :p > I have one general question: 0.97.1 is a bugfix

Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.97.1, 0.98 alpha and aMSN2

2008-05-28 Thread Boris Faure (aka billiob)
On 5/28/08, Mirko Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On the other hand, when we'll offer 0.98alpha in the next > days/weeks, we get problems if anyone wants to test this version and after > that reverts to 0.97.1 - in that case it would be better to have the patches > also in 0.97.1 to avoid problem

Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.97.1, 0.98 alpha and aMSN2

2008-05-28 Thread Mirko Hansen
I'll continue now merging where I stopped yesterday. Just had to go to bed yesterday before falling asleep on my keyboard ;-) I have one general question: 0.97.1 is a bugfix-release, but should we add some minor improvements, too? I have found two examples: r9545,9546: Dynamic frame-rate in the web

Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.97.1, 0.98 alpha and aMSN2

2008-05-28 Thread Tom Hennigan
On 28 May 2008, at 07:25, Youness Alaoui wrote: > Hello my friends! > > As Mirko said, he did have a few hours free and he did > commit a lot of branch merges!! thanks a lot Mirko! :) > > I also took the time (a few hours) to check every commit > made since 0.97 (almost 900 commits, wow!) and tri

Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.97.1, 0.98 alpha and aMSN2

2008-05-28 Thread Tom Hennigan
On 28 May 2008, at 07:25, Youness Alaoui wrote: > Hello my friends! > > As Mirko said, he did have a few hours free and he did > commit a lot of branch merges!! thanks a lot Mirko! :) > > I also took the time (a few hours) to check every commit > made since 0.97 (almost 900 commits, wow!) and tri

Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.97.1, 0.98 alpha and aMSN2

2008-05-28 Thread Youness Alaoui
Hello my friends! As Mirko said, he did have a few hours free and he did commit a lot of branch merges!! thanks a lot Mirko! :) I also took the time (a few hours) to check every commit made since 0.97 (almost 900 commits, wow!) and tried to see if they should be merged or not... up until revision