Hey, I know you want this to stop, but let me just explain some things to
you, anything I agree on will not be commented..
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:18:17 -0500, Hatredman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Historiadores acreditam que,
em Quarta 14 Dezembro 2005 15:03, Youness Alaoui disse:
The manag
Historiadores acreditam que,
em Quarta 14 Dezembro 2005 13:05, Lee Olson disse:
> Who are these managers? We should set a couple co-managers as reserve
> so they can take over a task or tasks if the other managers are busy
> and can't complete something in an appropriate timeframe, that way the
>
Historiadores acreditam que,
em Quarta 14 Dezembro 2005 15:03, Youness Alaoui disse:
> The managers are known, and they are part of the team members, so you can
> look in SF page.. I don't remember everyone, but I think there is Thomas,
> Harry and Hatredman, the last being their own manager..
No
Historiadores acreditam que,
em Quarta 14 Dezembro 2005 12:16, Youness Alaoui disse:
> hehe, that would be me :D
> I already answered this email, so I'll just say that 1 lang manager per
> language would be a total mess (image,3 developpers and 30 lang managers..
> are we a software or an inte
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:24:08 -0500, Vivia Nikolaidou
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the topic was 'change the script to send commits on lang files to
amsn-lang' and it become 'hire more people, one lang manager per
language (why not, one per key :P) have co-managers...
No, better not do it thi
In Worst Case Scenario I just have to setup a rule inside my mail
software to forward amsn-commits from lang files to amsn-lang.
Anyway, that's not the time to reinvent the wheel
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you gre
> the topic was 'change the script to send commits on lang files to
> amsn-lang' and it become 'hire more people, one lang manager per
> language (why not, one per key :P) have co-managers...
No, better not do it this way. Apart from that there will be too many
managers, I can see other proble
n we could
always add 1 or 2 more.
Lio
- Original Message -----
From: "Youness Alaoui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 1:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Amsn-devel] Re: Translations + release
hehe, that would be me :D
I already answered this email, so I
Message -
> From: "Youness Alaoui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 1:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [Amsn-devel] Re: Translations + release
>
>
> hehe, that would be me :D
> I already answered this email, so I'll just say that 1
mber 15, 2005 1:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Amsn-devel] Re: Translations + release
hehe, that would be me :D
I already answered this email, so I'll just say that 1 lang manager per
language would be a total mess (image,3 developpers and 30 lang managers..
are we a software or an international orga
hehe, that would be me :D
I already answered this email, so I'll just say that 1 lang manager per
language would be a total mess (image,3 developpers and 30 lang managers..
are we a software or an international organisation :P) anyways, lang
managers had what they wanted and I did give you b
Historiadores acreditam que,
em Seg 12 Dez 2005 20:41, Lee Olson disse:
> This is a good example of why we need to set a translation manager for
> each language (perhaps the most active individual). If we have a
> reliable manager for each language, they can accept translations from
> the other t
Hi,
sorry guys for troubling you, I know language managers are busy and I
can't do much about those new keys I added.. I tried using already
existing keys, but none was clear enough.. I do not request any work from
you on this matter for now, I mean, don't try to free the language queue
in
>On 12/12/05, Vivia Nikolaidou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Youness Alaoui wrote:
>
> [...]
> > sorry, I lost track of this mail, forgot to complete it and send it... in
> > short, don't worry about it, I don't want to put even more pressure on
> you,
> > keep it as it is, if
14 matches
Mail list logo
