Re: [analog-help] Differentiating GET and POST

2000-05-11 Thread Stephen Turner
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Aengus Lawlor wrote: > > I'm a little bit confused by your reference to MS-Extended - my copy of > IIS4 supports 3 log formats by default - IIS, NCSA and W3C-Extended. > What does your MS-Extended log look like? > I call it MS-EXTENDED in analog, to distinguish it from (W

Re: [analog-help] Differentiating GET and POST

2000-05-11 Thread Stephen Turner
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Sean D. Ackley wrote: > QUESTION FOR Stephen: 1. Can .asp be added to the default TYPEOUTPUTALIAS > for the next revision of Analog? Yes, good idea, I'll do that. Thanks. > Also remember that NT IIS4 will invariably add extra status lines into > your log files. These are c

Re: [analog-help] Differentiating GET and POST

2000-05-11 Thread Stephen Turner
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Edward Lucas wrote: > > Also, while I can include HTTP status 302 (using Analog4.1), I can't get > it listed as a successful request (I know it is a redirection - to a > temporary location, but, depending on your perspective, it counts as a > request made, just not one that t

Re: [analog-help] Analog Analyzer question

2000-05-11 Thread Stephen Turner
On Wed, 10 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi! > > I'm new to this list and was hoping someone could help me... I've included my > information from my stats page below. I was just wondering if the redirected > requests seem way out of wack. Could someone help me decipher? > > Successful r

Re: [analog-help] spiders and other creepy crawlies

2000-05-11 Thread Stephen Turner
On Wed, 10 May 2000, William Martin wrote: > > BROWEXCLUDE *spider*,*spyder*,*crawler* etc. > BROWEXCLUDE *Spider*,*Spyder* > > this gives much better results, but it's cumbersome. is there a way to make > only the browser field case insensitive (say a BROWCASE command, similar to > USERCASE)? I

Re: [analog-help] problems with uncompressing log-files

2000-05-11 Thread Stephen Turner
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Jeremy Wadsack wrote: > > > Daniel Quappe wrote: > > > unfortunately the config-switch UNCOMPRESS *.gz "gzip -cd" > > doesn't work well on my system. > > What uncompress does work? Try it from the command line until you get the > right switches and put that in you

Re: [analog-help] parsing file request parameters

2000-05-11 Thread Stephen Turner
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Ari Barkan wrote: > hello all- > > i am using analog 4.0 against IIS 4.0. > IIS archives file requests as > cs-method cs-uri-stem cs-uri-query, looking something like.. > GET /ajw/find.dll s=&uid=&cid=. > > i'd like to collect statistics on

Re: [analog-help] spiders and other creepy crawlies

2000-05-11 Thread Alejandro Fernandez
On Thu, 11 May 2000, you wrote: >On Wed, 10 May 2000, William Martin wrote: >> >> BROWEXCLUDE *spider*,*spyder*,*crawler* etc. >> BROWEXCLUDE *Spider*,*Spyder* >> >> this gives much better results, but it's cumbersome. is there a way to make >> only the browser field case insensitive (say a BROW

Re: [analog-help] spiders and other creepy crawlies

2000-05-11 Thread Stephen Turner
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Alejandro Fernandez wrote: > > That makes me think: > > can I go: > > USEREXCLUDE REGEXPI:Tom.*Jones > > or is it > > USEREXCLUDE REGEXPI:Tom\ Jones > > ? > Either. They mean different things. The first matches (case insensitively) Tom followed by any characters follow

[analog-help] regexps

2000-05-11 Thread Alejandro Fernandez
On Thu, 11 May 2000, you wrote: >On Thu, 11 May 2000, Alejandro Fernandez wrote: >> >> That makes me think: >> >> can I go: >> >> USEREXCLUDE REGEXPI:Tom.*Jones >> >> or is it >> >> USEREXCLUDE REGEXPI:Tom\ Jones >> >> ? >> > >Either. They mean different things. The first matches (case inse

Re: [analog-help] regexps

2000-05-11 Thread Stephen Turner
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Alejandro Fernandez wrote: > > I just tried and got the following: > > /software/analog/analog: Warning C: Bad argument in configuration command: > > So just for future reference, it appears analog doesn't like spaces in REGEXP > commands. (I'm using REGEXPI:Bryan.Adams, whi

[analog-help] Sorting DOMAIN report alphabetically

2000-05-11 Thread Michael Holtzman
When I specify DOMSORTBY ALPHABETICALLY I get an illegal option error (Analog 4.1 / Solaris). Am I doing something wrong, or is alphabetically sorting the domain report not allowed? Thanx. This is the analog-help mailing lis

Re: [analog-help] Analog Analyzer question

2000-05-11 Thread VeggiMa
Hi Stephen, Thank you for the answer... My site is a local city guide site for the Southern California Mountains, so many of the advertising banners take people off my site and on to my clients. What I wasn't sure about was how 10 times more people could be going off my site than were actually

Re: [analog-help] Sorting DOMAIN report alphabetically

2000-05-11 Thread Stephen Turner
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Michael Holtzman wrote: > When I specify DOMSORTBY ALPHABETICALLY I get an illegal option error > (Analog 4.1 / Solaris). Am I doing something wrong, or is alphabetically > sorting the domain report not allowed? > It's called ALPHABETICAL not ALPHABETICALLY -- Stephen Tur

Re: [analog-help] Analog Analyzer question

2000-05-11 Thread Stephen Turner
On Thu, 11 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Thank you for the answer... My site is a local city guide site for the > Southern California Mountains, so many of the advertising banners take people > off my site and on to my clients. What I wasn't sure about was how 10 times > more people co

[analog-help] Help Wanted

2000-05-11 Thread Stephen Turner
I've just posted a list of jobs that I'm looking for volunteers for to my site. Let me know if you have any comments. Or if you want to volunteer, of course. :) -- Stephen Turner http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/ Statistical Laboratory, Centre for Mathematical Sciences,

[Fwd: [Fwd: [analog-help] Report Magic]]

2000-05-11 Thread Jeremy Wadsack
Gideon Greenspan wrote: > > I am currently using Analog Helper on a Mac OS 8.6 and am happy with how it > > graphs the request visually. I'd like to use Report Magic with it to get > > some variations visually such as pie charts instead of the plan bar charts. > > Is this possible? I've downloa

[analog-help] where to find resolved IPs

2000-05-11 Thread Marco Bernardini
This address is really useful to resolve IP addresses: http://ipindex.dragonstar.net/index.html Bye! Marco Bernardini ^ "Smile and think deeply" Kerouac - Mexico City Blues ^ ---