Re: [analog-help] Re: FFS!!!

2000-09-25 Thread Stephen Turner
On 23 Sep 2000, Greg Stark wrote: > > Please read: > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > Setting Reply-To on a mailing list is simply incorrect behaviour. > I entirely disagree with almost everything on that page. The author isn't even correct about his basic assertion that

Re: [analog-help] Re: FFS!!!

2000-09-25 Thread Chris Rutter
On 23 Sep 2000, Greg Stark wrote: > Stephen Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > As to the question above -- I think Reply-To: list is actually more common. > > Setting Reply-To on a mailing list is simply incorrect behaviour. Actually, there's one big reason why I disagree with this: the

Re: [analog-help] Fw: Excluding Robots

2000-09-25 Thread Stephen Turner
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, troy hakala wrote: > Is there a way to exclude based on browser type? This would make exclusions for web >crawlers more accurate since excluding by IP address is not exactly the same thing. >What I want to do is exclude lines in the logfile where the browser is "GoogleBot",

[analog-help] APPROVE analog-help (fwd)

2000-09-25 Thread Stephen Turner
approve mfjjmand \ subscribe analog-help \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] end [The above is broken into multiple lines to avoid mail reader linewrap problems. Commands can be on one line, or multi-line with '\' escapes.] If you disapprove, do nothing. Thanks! [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: [analog-help] APPROVE analog-help (fwd)

2000-09-25 Thread Stephen Turner
Moral... never try and read email while listening to the Olympics on the radio. I changed the password before this hit the list, so don't try anything... -- Stephen Turner http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/ Statistical Laboratory, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge, CB3 0WB, England

[analog-help] HOSTEXCLUDE doesnt seem to work...

2000-09-25 Thread Flash
Hi there, I cant seem to get my HOSTEXCLUDE lines to work. Im using analog 4.0 on freebsd 3.4. Ive added and removed other things, and they work fine, but HOSTEXCLUDE lines just dont seem to make any difference... I searched the documentation, mail archive, bugs and faqs for this, but cant

Re: [analog-help] "reseting" analog...

2000-09-25 Thread Stephen Turner
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, mjn wrote: > > I reran analog but it doesn't seem to be parsing all of the data. How do > I get it to reread and make stats for everything anew? It doesn't save its state. If you rerun it, it will read everything afresh. -- Stephen Turner http://www.statslab

Re: [analog-help] Hosts report resolving

2000-09-25 Thread Stephen Turner
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, GREGG wrote: > Hi all, > gone blind searching the archives and documents. > Everything works, but a lot of the hosts in the host > report remain in IP address format only. > When I check the dnscache.txt for the IP address, > it has the name resolved beside it. > Anyone have

Re: [analog-help] HOSTEXCLUDE doesnt seem to work...

2000-09-25 Thread Stephen Turner
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Flash wrote: > Hi there, > > I cant seem to get my HOSTEXCLUDE lines to work. > > Im using analog 4.0 on freebsd 3.4. > > Ive added and removed other things, and they work fine, but HOSTEXCLUDE > lines just dont seem to make any difference... > > I searched the document

[analog-help] Scheduling Analog on NT

2000-09-25 Thread Aengus Lawlor
(Note that I will not changing jobs this week, so I will not be available at this e-mail address to answer questions about this directly. I'm not sure when I will get a chance to resubscribe to the list). A few months ago, I mentioned that it's easy to set up Analog to analyse daily IIS logs

[analog-help] Trouble getting anlgform.pl to work

2000-09-25 Thread Philip Clever
I am running Red Hat 6.1 Perl 5.* and the latest build of Apache. I have tried EVERYTHING in the troubleshooting guide. The analog executable works fine from the command line. Even the anlgform.pl works fine from the command line, as it spits out HTML code when I run it. All ownerships and per