Re: [analog-help] Analog 5.22 Problem

2002-04-24 Thread Aengus
Gregory N. Latiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My webhost has recently converted to Apache from Netscape. I have been > having a nightmare trying to get analog to read the new log format. I > found after much fiddling that I could use the +V+C command to enable > debugging. 'Debug on' in the cfg

[analog-help] DNS Lookup and Log File Formats

2002-04-24 Thread Mark Johnson
Hi Everyone, I've finally discovered the joys of Analog and what a great package, just what I've been looking for! Just installed Analog and have a few questions I'd like to run past you all... Firstly, I'm using Windows 2000 servers, with IIS5.0 and extended log formats. I've set up with co

[analog-help] Problem : compatibility FILEEXCLUDE/FILEINCLUDE and "Only certain files" field in the html form

2002-04-24 Thread LE BRETON Christian DTI Saclay 174286
Every time i use the FILEEXCLUDE/FILEINCLUDE options in the config file the "Only certain files" field in the html form, analog don't work correctly. It seems no files are excluded... knows someone the problem ? Christian Le Breton e@mél: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +

Re: [analog-help] DNS Lookup and Log File Formats

2002-04-24 Thread Aengus
Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Firstly, I'm using Windows 2000 servers, with IIS5.0 and extended log > formats. I've set up with configuration files but get a Category M > warning for EVERY log file, as below: > > analog: warning M: Logfile :\Analog\log_files\ex020419.log contains > li

Re: [analog-help] Analog 5.22 Problem - Solved

2002-04-24 Thread Aengus
Gregory N. Latiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have it working now. What I did not expect, nor does the example > show, was that unlike the examples (including the ones below), it is > necessary to explicitly specify every whitespace. It's not necessary to explicity specify every whitespace. T

Re: [analog-help] Analog 5.22 Problem

2002-04-24 Thread Aengus
Gregory N. Latiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am I correct in understanding you to be saying that the > format string used after the keyword 'APACHELOGFORMAT' uses some > other syntax than the format documented in 'logfmt'? It uses the format documented in the Apache documentation - it's simply

Re: [analog-help] Problem : compatibility FILEEXCLUDE/FILEINCLUDE and"Only certain files" field in the html form

2002-04-24 Thread Ted Fines
I have a similar problem, though I can't say that FILEEXCLUDE doesn't work at all. For example: FILEEXCLUDE *.gif,*.jpg,*.jpeg,*.GIF,*.JPG,*.JPEG DOES exclude those files from the report. On the other hand: FILEEXCLUDE /images/*.gif,/images/*.jpg,/images/*.jpeg,/images/*.GIF,/images/*.JPG,/ima

[analog-help] BASEURL does not work with OUTPUT COMPUTER

2002-04-24 Thread sredo
Hi there, I've noticed that when I specify 'OUTPUT COMPUTER' that the value that I've specified for BASEURL is not prepended to files in the Request Report. I think this may be a bug. Can anyone else verify this? Is this a bug or the way it was designed? Any help is much appreciated. -Sam

Re: [analog-help] BASEURL does not work with OUTPUT COMPUTER

2002-04-24 Thread Stephen Turner
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, sredo wrote: > Hi there, > I've noticed that when I specify 'OUTPUT COMPUTER' that the value that I've > specified for BASEURL is not prepended to files in the Request Report. I > think this may be a bug. Can anyone else verify this? Is this a bug or > the way it was de

Re: [analog-help] Problem : compatibility FILEEXCLUDE/FILEINCLUDE and "Only certain files" field in the html form

2002-04-24 Thread Stephen Turner
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, LE BRETON Christian DTI Saclay 174286 wrote: > Every time i use the FILEEXCLUDE/FILEINCLUDE options in the config > file the "Only certain files" field in the html form, analog don't > work correctly. It seems no files are excluded... > knows someone the problem ? > It de

RE: [analog-help] Problem : compatibility FILEEXCLUDE/FILEINCLUDE and "Only certain files" field in the html form

2002-04-24 Thread LE BRETON Christian DTI Saclay 174286
Thanks, i try that solution > -Message d'origine- > De : Stephen Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 24 avril 2002 17:34 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: [analog-help] Problem : compatibility > FILEEXCLUDE/FILEINCLUDE and "Only certain files" field in the > html fo

Re: [analog-help] BASEURL does not work with OUTPUT COMPUTER

2002-04-24 Thread sredo
Thanks. However, when I specify the second argument, Analog produces no results. Any idea why? At 16:30 24/04/2002 +0100, you wrote: >On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, sredo wrote: > > > Hi there, > > I've noticed that when I specify 'OUTPUT COMPUTER' that the value that > I've > > specified for BASEURL

Re: [analog-help] Apache log file, request contains embedded return character

2002-04-24 Thread Stephen Turner
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Richard A. DeVenezia wrote: > I am trying to analyze some standard Apache log files generated on a Linux > system. > > For some reason, some of the request URL's contain an embedded carriage > return. > They cause a C: message from analog when configured for DEBUG ON. > > H

Re: [analog-help] Virtual sites

2002-04-24 Thread Stephen Turner
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, [Windows-1252] Peep Võrno - HELMES wrote: > > analog.cfg has: > > LOGFILE /l/apache/logs/ilm.access_log http://www.ilm.ee > LOGFILE /l/apache/logs/weather.access_log http://www.weather.ee > LOGFILE /l/apache/logs/pogoda.access_log http://www.pogoda.ee > SUBDIR http://*/*/* >

Re: [analog-help] INTSEARCHENGINE issue...

2002-04-24 Thread Stephen Turner
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Rietti, Giorgio wrote: > Hi... > > Have the following problem. > > Logfile looks like this > Thu Apr 11 05:28:01 EDT 2002xxx - > http://localhost:8585/xxx/xxx?CLASS=ME01&CSID=738712&TM=2&DT=10-Apr-02&EDT=&; > CTX=1&BRK=2&VIEW=/xml.jsp&GX=600&GY=400&SR=1&ER=31

Re: [analog-help] BASEURL does not work with OUTPUT COMPUTER

2002-04-24 Thread Stephen Turner
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, sredo wrote: > Thanks. > However, when I specify the second argument, Analog produces no > results. Any idea why? > Maybe you've got a FILEINCLUDE that no longer matches? -- Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UKhttp://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/ "This is Henman's

Re: [analog-help] BASEURL does not work with OUTPUT COMPUTER

2002-04-24 Thread sredo
If I had FILEINCLUDE that no longer matches, then how could the reports work normally? Especially if all I've done is add a second argument to the LOGFILE command? Help is much appreciated. Cheers. -Sam At 16:48 24/04/2002 +0100, you wrote: >On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, sredo wrote: > > > Thanks. >

Re: [analog-help] BASEURL does not work with OUTPUT COMPUTER

2002-04-24 Thread Stephen Turner
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, sredo wrote: > If I had FILEINCLUDE that no longer matches, then how could the reports > work normally? Especially if all I've done is add a second argument to the > LOGFILE command? > The second argument to the LOGFILE command actually changes the filename. For example,

Re: [analog-help] BASEURL does not work with OUTPUT COMPUTER

2002-04-24 Thread sredo
Thanks Stephen, That fixed it. From the documentation, I wouldn't have guessed that the second argument would impact any FILEINCLUDE statements. Cheers. -Sam At 17:09 24/04/2002 +0100, you wrote: >On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, sredo wrote: > > > If I had FILEINCLUDE that no longer matches, then how co

[analog-help] PROCTIME report

2002-04-24 Thread Maff Rigby
Hi, I am trying to include a processing time report. In my cfg file I have the following statements: PROCTIME ON PROCTIMECOLS Rpb PROCTIMECHART ON When I run analog, the errorfile says: analog: Warning R: Turning off empty Processing Time Report Can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong? Than

Re: [analog-help] BASEURL does not work with OUTPUT COMPUTER

2002-04-24 Thread Stephen Turner
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, sredo wrote: > Thanks Stephen, > > That fixed it. From the documentation, I wouldn't have guessed that the > second argument would impact any FILEINCLUDE statements. > Agreed. I'll make that clear in the next version. Thanks for pointing it out. -- Stephen Turner, Camb

Re: [analog-help] PROCTIME report

2002-04-24 Thread Stephen Turner
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Maff Rigby wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to include a processing time report. In my cfg file I have the > following statements: > > PROCTIME ON > PROCTIMECOLS Rpb > PROCTIMECHART ON > > When I run analog, the errorfile says: > > analog: Warning R: Turning off empty Process

[analog-help] User Report

2002-04-24 Thread Mussaf, Joshua [NORUS]
Title: User Report The Intranet server log file captures the user name and when I generate the User Report, it will list the top 50 users by name and states ## users not listed. Is there a configuration command to allow the user report to list more than the top 50 users? I would like to be ab

Re: [analog-help] User Report

2002-04-24 Thread glee
Cool, I get to help those who have helped me. Here's the answer: USERFLOOR -1500r Is this a great product or what! glee "Mussaf, Joshua

[analog-help] last x day statistics

2002-04-24 Thread Patrick Erler
hello analog-help! is there a way to get information which directory caused the most traffic, lets say, in the last 7 days? PAT -- vcard/LDAP/PGP: http://dresden-online.com/perler/identity.html PGP fingerprint: DAC6 2FDA 1ED7 AD55 BD1F 5142 3D5F 72BF +---

Re: [analog-help] last x day statistics

2002-04-24 Thread Stephen Turner
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Patrick Erler wrote: > hello analog-help! > > is there a way to get information which directory caused the most > traffic, lets say, in the last 7 days? > 7 days is easy. You can list the last 7 days traffic using the DIRCOLS command, and sort by that column with DIRSORTBY