On 28 Jun 1999, Christoph Dietz wrote:
> > analog --version
>
> ... will only output some statistics to the shell.
>
If analog --version doesn't give a message like
This is analog version 3.3/Unix
For help see docs/Readme.html, or http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/analog/
then it's no
> analog --version
... will only output some statistics to the shell.
> which analog
././analog
and this is the compiled 3.3 ... :-)
--
Christoph Dietz
-
Deutsche Lebens-Rettungs-Gesellschaft e.V.
AK Interne
On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
>
> However, as there are other dependecies (e.g. %b gives byte counts for these) maybe
> that's not feasable. Also, it might clutter up the reference too much.
>
I see what you mean now. But also, some items can appear under two different
names (%m, %
Stephen Turner wrote:
> > Also, on that page, it might be useful to list, with each report type, the
> > LOGFORMAT commands/data that Analog needs to generate that report.
> >
>
> I don't really understand what you mean here. The LOGFORMAT isn't an issue,
> as long as it contains the relevant t
Stephen Turner wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Marjorie A. Tiefert wrote:
> >
> > One additional suggestion - would it be possible to link from the
> > command names in quickref.html and the items in the index to named
> > anchors within the files the links go to? That would be much more useful
>
On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
>
> Here's a typos I found on the reports page:
> overall statstics -> overall statistics
>
Thanks.
> Also, on that page, it might be useful to list, with each report type, the
> LOGFORMAT commands/data that Analog needs to generate that report.
>
I
On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Marjorie A. Tiefert wrote:
>
> One additional suggestion - would it be possible to link from the
> command names in quickref.html and the items in the index to named
> anchors within the files the links go to? That would be much more useful
> than having to search the entire
On 24 Jun 1999, Christoph Dietz wrote:
>
> I have installed analog3.3 into the same dir as analog3.11 was. But
> now the analog3.3-output tells me that it is made with analog3.11.
> I don't know from there 3.3 gets this information.
>
Hmmm, sounds like you've still got a copy of 3.11 somewhere
Stephen Turner wrote:
> I have written a couple more pages for the documentation, in response to
> those people who wanted more reference sections.
>
> I've made them available on the web, and I would welcome comments on them
> before I package them up in the next version.
>
> You can find them
Stephen --
Stephen Turner wrote:
>
> I have written a couple more pages for the documentation, in response to
> those people who wanted more reference sections.
>
> I've made them available on the web, and I would welcome comments on them
> before I package them up in the next version.
>
> You
> I have written a couple more pages for the documentation, in response to
> those people who wanted more reference sections.
Thanks for that, I will take a closer look at it tomorrow.
But one question. You're writing:
"At the end of the report you can see which version of analog produced the r
I have written a couple more pages for the documentation, in response to
those people who wanted more reference sections.
I've made them available on the web, and I would welcome comments on them
before I package them up in the next version.
You can find them at
http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~
12 matches
Mail list logo
