Can anyone find something wrong in the LOGFILE AND HOSTNAME commands (e.g:
comments, path)?
And Is an additional command line for Internet Explorer necesary?
# If you need a LOGFORMAT command it must go here, above the LOGFILE
command.
LOGFILE C:\WINNT\system32\LogFiles\W3SVC1\in000201.log
HOSTN
>Can anyone find something wrong in the LOGFILE AND HOSTNAME commands (e.g:
>comments, path)?
>And Is an additional command line for Internet Explorer necesary?
># If you need a LOGFORMAT command it must go here, above the LOGFILE
>command.
>LOGFILE C:\WINNT\system32\LogFiles\W3SVC1\in000201.log
doesn't seem
to ask for one.
Patience, please :-]
-Original Message-
From: Good; Brandon (DSS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 1:59 PM
Subject: RE: [analog-help] Set up on NT
>Can anyone fin
nal Message-
From: Good; Brandon (DSS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 1:59 PM
Subject: RE: [analog-help] Set up on NT
>Can anyone find something wrong in the LOGFILE AND HOSTNAME commands (e.g:
>comments
>Can anyone find something wrong in the LOGFILE AND HOSTNAME commands (e.g:
>comments, path)?
Why? Are you getting an error? If so, what's the error?
>And Is an additional command line for Internet Explorer necesary?
It's not necessary, but IE will be listed as "Netscape compatible" using
th
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks Brandon, but are you saying that I should write the logfiles to a
> published directory (wwwroot\myLogfiles) and put that absolute path in the
> config file (e.g.; http://serverIPaddress\myLogFiles\ex000202.log )?
> I don't understand your refe
500
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <019101bf727e$ec7c0620$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Rob Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [analog-help] Set up on NT
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 16:53:24 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: t
;s Office of Community Services
-Original Message-
From: Good; Brandon (DSS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 1:59 PM
Subject: RE: [analog-help] Set up on NT
>Can anyone find something wrong in the L
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OK, this is what I get in my report...(how do I fix corrupt logfile lines?)
>
> General Summary
> (Go To: Top: General Summary)
>
> Successful requests: 0
> Logfile lines without status code: 6
> Corrupt logfile lines: 318
>
Ah, in that case your
contact to share ideas/problems, etc
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 February 2000 21:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [analog-help] Set up on NT
Thanks everyone,
I got it to work by moving the logf
contact to share ideas/problems, etc
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 February 2000 21:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [analog-help] Set up on NT
Thanks everyone,
I got it to work by moving the logf
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Any ideas on running Analog automatically (daily) so I don't have to touch
> the server?
This is in the FAQ.
> BTW, I still get corrupt logfile lines.
How many? A handful is harmless, but if you have a lot you should probably
adjust your configura
12 matches
Mail list logo
