Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My reason for joining the mailing list is to ask the line required to
> display all search engine terms and words. Analog only displays the
> top 30 Regards
SEARCHQUERYFLOOR and SEARCHWORDFLOOR
You can read about how they are used here:
http://www.analog.cx/do
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [analog-help] recommendation for dns helper?
> > As a general rule, DNS helper applications are
> > faster than analog at DNS lookups.
> >
>
> Thanks for this and the suggestions, Duke.
>
> As a general rule, DNS helper applications are
> faster than analog at DNS lookups.
>
Thanks for this and the suggestions, Duke.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
ClubW
As a general rule, DNS helper applications are
faster than analog at DNS lookups. Which one
to use? I used "xdns" but now use "jdresolve".
I liked the ability of "xdns" to merge DNS files,
remove old entries, and warn me if two names
were assigned to one IP. It was easy to install
and configure
I'm contemplating going from analog dns resolution to a helper. There
are about a dozen listed. What are the recommendations for Linux?
Or, other question: is "outsourcing" dns res worth it?
If it's crucial for the recommendation:
The Apache log files to process are *big* and range from 10 MB
u
