On Friday, October 12, 2007 4:53 PM [EDT],
Aengus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
These lines should replace lines 869-874 in the original tree.c:
else if (*(c + 1) == '.' && (*(c + 2) == '2')) {
if (strstr(whole, "; x64;") != NULL)
*name = "Windows:Windows XP64";
else
Aengus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you replace lines 868-874 in trees.c with these lines:
>
> if (strstr(whole, "; x64;") != NULL)
> *name = "Windows:Windows XP64";
> else
> *name = "Windows:Windows XP";
> }
> else if (*(c + 1) == '.' && (*(c + 2) == '2'))
Chris Tilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aengus,Exactly as I said to begin with.
>
> Anyway, As a challenge I have attempted to build this both last night
> and tonight using said 'more efficient method', and it doesn't
> work.Having said that, I just tried your method 5 minutes ago and it
> doesn
On a personal note on that comment, I would like to know who these people are
that are advising you to use Flash, because as a professional web designer,
I've yet to find anyone who does...Flash is a tool, and unless you have
specific need you plain should not use it.Oh and windows will not only
Aengus,
Exactly as I said.
As a challenge I have attempted to build this both last night and tonight
using said 'more efficient method', and it doesn't work.
Having said that, I just tried your method 5 minutes ago and it doesn't work
either!
Seems to be that this line doesn't work: if (strst
Aengus,Exactly as I said to begin with.
Anyway, As a challenge I have attempted to build this both last night and
tonight using said 'more efficient method', and it doesn't work.Having said
that, I just tried your method 5 minutes ago and it doesn't work either!Seems
to be that this line doesn
On a personal note on that comment, I would like to know who these people
are that are advising you to use Flash, because as a professional web
designer, I've yet to find anyone who does...
Flash is a tool, and unless you have specific need you plain should not use
it.
Oh and windows will not
On Thursday 11 October 2007 18:54:46 Walter Ian Kaye wrote:
> Perhaps some Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard developer here (anyone here
> seeded?) could chime in on whether Dimitri's presumptions about
> doubled RAM or disk usage apply or not?
Objection Your Honor! According to OED, presumption is "taking u
Just throwing my 2p in.
We're starting to look for 64bit OS's now... I've been using one for over 8
years. The browsers I've run are both 32bit and 64bit but also I've had to use
different browser strings because of some websites refusal to work with
anything but IE.
The OS I use - Solaris, i
9 matches
Mail list logo
