Re: [analog-help] Shift of time

2005-01-07 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2005-01-07 17:56:00 -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > what's wrong with piping your log file through a little awk sript if > you're not happy with timestamps in there and want to massage them a > bit before processing? This is not my job to do this kind of things. > This way, if you want combined

Re: [analog-help] Shift of time

2005-01-07 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2005-01-07 12:17:13 -0800, Stephen Turner wrote: > Not all logfiles report the timezone. Apache does. When the timezone is available, why not use it? > Even when they do, there is no standard way to retrieve the timezone > of the local machine You're wrong (well, in fact, at least for the tim

Re: [analog-help] Shift of time

2005-01-06 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2005-01-06 13:42:13 -0600, Duke Hillard wrote: > You mention system settings on your personal machine. > Analog is run on many different systems. I imagine that > including the ability to recognize local time on so many > different systems would be a programming nightmare. OK, so it would be f

Re: [analog-help] Shift of time

2005-01-06 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2005-01-06 15:11:46 -, Aengus wrote: > The LOGTIMEOFFSET command is used to allow Analog to recalculate the > GMT timestamps in your logfiles and display the times using your > local timezone. LOGTIMEOFFSET is really annonying due to the summer/winter times. Isn't it possible to ask Analog

Re: [analog-help] Browsers: Netscape vs "Netscape (compatible)

2005-01-04 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2005-01-04 16:14:04 -0800, Jeremy Wadsack wrote: > "Netscape (compatile)" generally is an alias for any browser that > matches "Mozilla/* (compatible*". These days that's pretty much just IE. But I suppose that a better guess could be done in some cases. So, * Is it possible to know what is t

Re: [analog-help] Browsers: Netscape vs "Netscape (compatible)

2005-01-04 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2005-01-04 18:53:41 -, Aengus wrote: > If you look in your logfiles, you'll see that the Browser that was used > to make each request is recorded, usually at the end of each log entry. > These look something like this: > "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows 98)" > "Mozilla/4.0 [en] (

[analog-help] Order of log files is significant for browser summary

2004-12-26 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Hi, Is there any reason why the order of log files is significant for the browser summary report? In the following diff, out1 is produced with the log files listed in chronological order and out2 is produced with access_log*. dixsept:~/private/www-logs> diff -u out1 out2 --- out12004-12-