Dan – thanks for the thorough update, hope you don’t mind if I repost this to
the analytics list – I bet several people on this list are eager to know where
this is going.
Dario
Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Milimetric
> Subject: [Maniphest] [Commented On] T44259: Make domas' pageviews
Thanks Dario, I should've thought to do the same. As I say in my comment,
I'd love to get a discussion going here. This project has been in the dark
and postponed for too long, and now that we're focusing on it everyone
deserves our direct thoughts on it. Everyone here also has the right to
dire
Why is the work on Domas's data, which we know is incredibly
unreliable? Because people still rely on it?
On 21 May 2015 at 12:39, Dan Andreescu wrote:
> Thanks Dario, I should've thought to do the same. As I say in my comment,
> I'd love to get a discussion going here. This project has been in
the title of the Phab ticket is obsolete, the plan is not to work off the
existing hourly PV dumps, per Dan’s note.
> On May 21, 2015, at 9:50 AM, Oliver Keyes wrote:
>
> Why is the work on Domas's data, which we know is incredibly
> unreliable? Because people still rely on it?
>
> On 21 May 2
Sweet :)
On 21 May 2015 at 12:56, Dario Taraborelli wrote:
> the title of the Phab ticket is obsolete, the plan is not to work off the
> existing hourly PV dumps, per Dan’s note.
>
>> On May 21, 2015, at 9:50 AM, Oliver Keyes wrote:
>>
>> Why is the work on Domas's data, which we know is incred
Hi all - some interesting analysis on the share-a-fact feature from the mobile
team.
-Toby
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Adam Baso
> Date: May 21, 2015 at 12:05:29 PDT
> To: mobile-l
> Subject: [WikimediaMobile] Share a Fact Initial Analysis
>
> Hello all,
>
> We’ve been looking at some
