Re: [Analytics] Clickstream: mobile vs. desktop, empty referrers

> > I found that it even drove Groupon to conduct an iffy experiment: they > "deindexed" themselves from Google for about 6 hours, finding that "Up To > 60% Of “Direct” [i.e., referrer '-'] Traffic Is Actually Organic Search"... > https://searchengineland.com/60-direct-traffic-actually-seo-195415

Re: [Analytics] Clickstream: mobile vs. desktop, empty referrers

Thanks a lot for the info, Joseph and Nuria. These "none" referrers are problematic for all the analytics teams out there, it seems. When searching about around the issue of "none" referrers, I found that it even drove Groupon to conduct an iffy experiment: they "deindexed" themselves from Google

Re: [Analytics] Clickstream: mobile vs. desktop, empty referrers

Hello, See https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T195880 for info on "none" referrers. Thanks, Nuria On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:10 AM Joseph Allemandou wrote: > Hi Robert > > From the `WHERE` clause here: > >

Re: [Analytics] Clickstream: mobile vs. desktop, empty referrers

Hi Robert >From the `WHERE` clause here: https://github.com/wikimedia/analytics-refinery-source/blob/master/refinery-job/src/main/scala/org/wikimedia/analytics/refinery/job/ClickstreamBuilder.scala#L283 you can see that we bundloe altogether desktop, mobile-web and mobile-app rows. As for the

[Analytics] Clickstream: mobile vs. desktop, empty referrers

Hi Analytics team, Quick question: Does the Clickstream data lump together *mobile and desktop?* It seems to be hinted at here , but it's not mentioned explicitly. It just