2)I guess there is no guarantee. To be certain of the font
availability, considering .ttf file size, it should be better for you
to include desired font inside /assets directory, and then load it
with something like this:
public void setFont(TextView in){
Typeface font = Typeface.c
> My point is that in order to make it inconvenient to pirate, you need
> your LVL to sneak past the tool. Worrying about a human cracking your
> app is less of an issue as by the time one does that the app has
> likely been out for a while and you have an update almost ready. But
> if the tool wo
>
> The PackageManager GET_SIGNATURES call can be hooked to return the
> original signature even if the package has been hacked and re-signed.
> There is a script somewhere on the 'net that does this automatically.
Could you kindly provide a link? Do you mean that my check is useless?
Anyway, I d
> > Does this work at all? The signature is different from the public key, so
> > it
> > shouldn't.
Yes it works, I wrote "MY_LONG_PUBLIC_KEY", but I meant "signature".
thank you for replying Dianne, I knew it's a matter of time. Since the
app costs less than 3$, I hope the three implemented leve
Hi,
I was trying to implement suggestions as described in famous article
by Tim Bray:
http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2010/09/securing-android-lvl-applications.html
I hope I understood the concepts, but I'm experiencing difficulties
with the tamper-proof part. Infact, as long as I calculat
ation too large for
this process.
E/( 461): VM won't let us allocate 290560 bytes
D/AndroidRuntime( 461): Shutting down VM
such issue can be reproduced easily, could someone tell me if it is a
known issue or there are
some workaround for it?
guys:
I guess it is a old issue, and I have googled the related message
in the group, and I think I do not miss anything:
1. I made the MD5 fingerprint of the SDK debug dertificate by
keytool,
and I applied the maps api key, refer to //code.google.com/
android/
toolbox/apis/mapkey.htm
2. I adde
guys:
I guess it is a old issue, and I have googled the related message
in the group, and I think I do not miss anything:
1. I made the MD5 fingerprint of the SDK debug dertificate by
keytool,
and I applied the maps api key, refer to //code.google.com/
android/
toolbox/apis/mapkey.htm
2. I adde
shine
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-
guys:
I guess it is a old issue, and I have googled the related message
in the group, and I think I do not miss anything:
1. I made the MD5 fingerprint of the SDK debug dertificate by keytool,
and I applied the maps api key, refer to //code.google.com/android/
toolbox/apis/mapkey.htm
2. I added
I found if I use "GSM" LOG TAG, I can not get the output by logcat, it
is so weird!
and I check the implement of Log class, it seems no specical handling.
can anyone help to make clear about it? Any ideas would be helpful.
thanks
Shine
--~--~-~--~~~---~--
permission seems no sense.
can anyone help to make clear about it? Any ideas would be helpful.
thanks
Shine
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, sen
all,
I have a question about uses-permission: when I make an app, if I
declare all
uses-permission which I wants in my manifest.xml, the app can get the
service, i.e
INTERNET.
it seems no sense, right?
regards
shine
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
13 matches
Mail list logo
