I had not copied the code here, but re-wrote it in the post. This miss
was because I made mistake while typing.
And I got -1 cause my content provider was getting registered. It was
not a problem
Now I will write the test case as you said and it will also help me
fix the code properly.
Basically
I missed the mismatch as well; it's subtle. In your manifest, you set
the authority to com.arpit.providers.MyContentProvider, while in the
code you set it to com.arpit.provider.MyContentProvider. Note the
missing "s" for provider in the code. The ContentResolver shouldn't be
able to resolve your pr
Hi Elk,
Thanks again for your time and specifying your points. Finally I found
out the problem why the code wasn't working after lot of debugging.
Turned out that the table name and the Uri given was wrong. A stupid
typo was the issue.
Also, sorry I can't post the original code as I am under lega
As far as I can tell from what you've posted, you're declaring
CONTENT_URI as a String or some sort of string-related immutable
class. If you look at the NotePad example, CONTENT_URI is of type Uri,
and it's constructed using Uri.parse.
You may be doing this, but what you've posted doesn't indicat
You should not hijack existing threads with new questions that do not
correspond to the original thread. That makes it very difficult for
people to find the original thread. Instead, you should start a new
thread with your question.
That said, I see that the value of the AUTHORITY that you declare
5 matches
Mail list logo