On 5月12日, 上午2時23分, Greg KH wrote:
>
> The first one adds an ethernet driver, right? Why is this needed in the .27
> android kernel tree?
Because .27 doesn't have atl2 driver, which is necessary for us
who working on x86 porting, especially for EeePC 701.
> The second fixes a real problem. Ple
I don't have an answer for your question. I don't know why .29 is not
released with CUPCAKE and when it will be released. Maybe google guys
could comment. I'm about to try it out on my eeePC and will keep
everyone posted. For the patchs, I will let Chih-wei to reply when he
wakes up. (he is in ano
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Chih-Wei wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have tried to submit two patches (9749, 9782) to 2.6.27 branch.
> One is an enhancement (adding a driver) and the other is a bug fix for
> a kernel exception.
The first one adds an ethernet driver, right? Why is this needed in the .27
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Yi Sun wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 11:04 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>> > I don't like such a reason. If 2.6.27 is an obsolete branch, it is
>> > fair to reject by this reason.
>> > But 2.6.27 is still the master branch (correct if I'm wrong),
>> > I can't see any r
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 11:04 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Chih-Wei wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I have tried to submit two patches (9749, 9782) to 2.6.27 branch.
>
> Do you have direct links to these patches?
>
> > One is an enhancement (adding a driver) and the other is a
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Chih-Wei wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have tried to submit two patches (9749, 9782) to 2.6.27 branch.
Do you have direct links to these patches?
> One is an enhancement (adding a driver) and the other is a bug fix for
> a kernel exception.
> These patches are just back-po