-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
This weekend I worked on backporting the autotools.bbclass and
base.bbclass changes that fix .la files, so the autobuilder (which
uses rm_work) can finally build e-wm. After inspecting the changes and
some serious time with meld I have a bac
Koen Kooi wrote:
If we drop the bookkeeping part, getting things into the stable tree
will be much easier:
* send explanation and diff to angstrom-distro-devel
* 2 developers sign off on it
* apply diff
* copy-paste explanation into NEWS or Changelog
This makes a faster turnaround possible, s
On 03/24/2008 05:41 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> This weekend I worked on backporting the autotools.bbclass and
> base.bbclass changes that fix .la files, so the autobuilder (which
> uses rm_work) can finally build e-wm. After inspecting the changes and
> some serious time with meld I have a backpo
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Koen Kooi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> This weekend I worked on backporting the autotools.bbclass and
> base.bbclass changes that fix .la files, so the autobuilder (which
> uses rm_work) can finally build
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Junqian Gordon Xu schreef:
|
| The bigger question is what's the fate of the current stable branch. How
| long are we going to keep it maintained?
That's up to angstrom developers to decide. My gut feeling is that the
2008 release is at least 6 month
Hello all,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Philip Balister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Koen Kooi wrote:
> > If we drop the bookkeeping part, getting things into the stable tree
> > will be much easier:
> > ...
> > objections, additions?
>
> +1
>
> At some point in time, a stable and devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leon Woestenberg schreef:
| Hello all,
|
| On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Philip Balister
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> Koen Kooi wrote:
|> > If we drop the bookkeeping part, getting things into the stable tree
|> > will be much easier:
|> > ...
Hello Koen,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Koen Kooi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | If not done yet, we have to decide to go for one of two approaches.
> | (1) .stable tracks .dev, but lags. Takes lots of efforts.
> | (2) .stable diverges from .dev, not keeping up at some point. The
> | "fis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leon Woestenberg schreef:
| Hello Koen,
|
| On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Koen Kooi
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> | If not done yet, we have to decide to go for one of two approaches.
|> | (1) .stable tracks .dev, but lags. Takes lots of efforts
Hello all,
> Do you want to write a short blurb on this we can stick on the oe and
> angstrom websites? regards, Koen
Sure, a first shot at that (and sorry for cross-posting, but this
really is OE related :-)
---
The OpenEmbedded project has started to maintain a stable branch, next
to its deve
>
> | I am very much in favor of keeping the tooling/framework/classes
> | largely feature-frozen within a stable branch, and
> selectively upgrade
> | packages.
>
> That is my idea as well, I did backport the native.bbclass
> change since it fixed rm_work, which is very important since
> th
11 matches
Mail list logo
