Your best opportunity this week to earn a lot of thanks, pls let us chairs know!
Thanks so much!
Toerless - for the chairs.
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
Want to throw a different proposal in the room.
See proposal in my slides tomorrow, i think we may want to include more
information,
even when the actual variation is just a single string.
Cheers
toerless
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 05:52:27PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> On 26-Jul-23
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> Since we are doing this in std >> track documents (so they get the
>> ultimate considerations, of IESG >> action, in effect), the value of
>> the registry is that it lets people >> find the document that goes
>> with the value. > Yes, makes sense.
On 26-Jul-23 09:06, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > That makes sense, but it probably needs to be normatively specified,
> > which would avoid any need to change RFC 8995, except perhaps an
> > erratum to delete that "(list of)" wart.
> I didn't get the
On 26-Jul-23 09:06, Michael Richardson wrote:
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> That makes sense, but it probably needs to be normatively specified,
> which would avoid any need to change RFC 8995, except perhaps an
> erratum to delete that "(list of)" wart.
I didn't get the "(list
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> That makes sense, but it probably needs to be normatively specified,
> which would avoid any need to change RFC 8995, except perhaps an
> erratum to delete that "(list of)" wart.
I didn't get the "(list of)" wart...
>> (IP addresses could change not
On 26-Jul-23 01:07, Michael Richardson wrote:
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Yes, but you can map them in CBOR just as
> draft-eckert-anima-grasp-dnssd already describes. (Think JSON but code
> CBOR.) My only real concern is how to extend the objective for the
>
Looking at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C472
It is being held up by:
draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud NOT-RECEIVED
draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs NOT-RECEIVED
draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis NOT-RECEIVED
I'm responsible for 7030-csrattrs, and it's either done or gets
On 25. Jul 2023, at 15:07, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> I have resisted suggestions that we put an array for the objective-value, and
> also that it have a string that needs to be parsed like
> "mode=prm,foo=1,bar=2"...
You give a good reason not to do this at all.
But if you want to do this,
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Yes, but you can map them in CBOR just as
> draft-eckert-anima-grasp-dnssd already describes. (Think JSON but code
> CBOR.) My only real concern is how to extend the objective for the
> AN_join_registrar. It seems lame to use plain text when a
10 matches
Mail list logo
