Re: [Anima] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-12,
ends September 20th 2022
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 10:33:47AM +, Michael Richardson wrote:
> > How would you deal with proxies that are on frequencies where the duty
> cycle
> > is limited by law. For e
Toerless Eckert wrote:
>> Your 868 system might be unable to complete onboarding, or maybe it will
take
>> an hour.
> I have to admit i do not even managed to figure out the nominal bitrate
best case
> for he 969 Mhz system ;-) But also the ZWave "Interview" (the system i am
u
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 10:33:47AM +, Michael Richardson wrote:
> > How would you deal with proxies that are on frequencies where the duty
> cycle
> > is limited by law. For example devices on my 868 home automation
> network needs to maintain
> > a 1%/hour duty cycle.
>
> "by la
Toerless Eckert wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 07:49:06AM +, Esko Dijk wrote:
>> For the stateless proxy, it is hard to determine a good rate limit
number. 1% is not good because it would slow down the joining process of a
genuine Pledge to a crawl. Some strategies that could work
s of services/resources
> advertised.
Right. likewise for DNS-SD (with or without GRASP).
Cheers
toerless
>
> Regards
> Esko
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Toerless Eckert
> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 21:24
> To: Esko Dijk
> Cc: Michael Richardson
Esko Dijk wrote:
--> For completeness the server should also respond with the BRSKI root
resource, which matches the filter. So:
> RES: 2.05 Content
> ;rt=brski.rjp,
> ;rt=brski,
okay.
> The motivation why to do this particular query is not so clear in the
> document.
Esko Dijk wrote:
> For the stateless proxy, it is hard to determine a good rate limit
> number. 1% is not good because it would slow down the joining process
> of a genuine Pledge to a crawl. Some strategies that could work better:
> 1. Initially allow a (near) unlimited use of "
Toerless Eckert wrote:
> For the stateful proxy, the pull request from my review i sent last
friday suggests the
> following text:
> To protect itself and the Registrar against malfunctioning Pledges
> and or denial of service attacks, the join proxy SHOULD limit the
> numbe
Hi, I've just rewriten the JPY message to be an actual CoAP header as
discussed at the CORE/IOTOPS meeting on Oct12.
I'll post an email to CORE@ and ANIMA@ about that part, where I have a few
technical questions.
The result of that effort is at:
https://github.com/anima-wg/constrained-join-prox
ent discovery methods support that at least.
For CoAP discovery at least some "service availability parameter" could be
defined in general so that it can be used for any types of services/resources
advertised.
Regards
Esko
-----Original Message-----
From: Toerless Eckert
Sent: Monday, Sept
r
> to it as security consideration.
> For a mesh network, avoiding an outsider to be able to "load" the mesh links
> with random data is especially important.
Indeed. Hopefully the #state and rate limiters proposed above would be
sufficient to get past
this point ?
Cheers
-
From: Michael Richardson
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2022 12:31
To: Esko Dijk
Cc: Anima WG ; anima-cha...@ietf.org; stokcons
Subject: Re: [Anima] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-12,
ends September 20th 2022
Okay, thank you. I'll crunch through your comments on Friday
ael Richardson
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2022 12:31
To: Esko Dijk
Cc: Anima WG ; anima-cha...@ietf.org; stokcons
Subject: Re: [Anima] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-12,
ends September 20th 2022
Okay, thank you. I'll crunch through your comments on Friday.
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
Okay, thank you. I'll crunch through your comments on Friday.
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
1
[RFC9032] is not a normative reference as far as I can see. It is only
mentioned in 6.3.2 and this says that 6tisch is not even using the present
protocol.
-Original Message-
From: Anima On Behalf Of Toerless Eckert
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 19:13
To: Anima WG ; anima-ch
Dear ANIMA WG
This message starts the two-week ANIMA Working Group Last Call
to advance draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-04,
"Constrained Join Proxy for Bootstrapping Protocols". The WGLC
ends after September 20th, or when all comments received are discussed.
This document had a prior WGLC
16 matches
Mail list logo