e yet to need it yet, since converting all my SLS files to Ansible,
> so that may speak to the wide array of modules available to you in ansible
> that was missing in salt.
>
>
> On Monday, December 14, 2015 at 7:32:39 AM UTC-8, Fff Fff wrote:
>>
>> I am leaning
Are you sure you have fqdn set up properly? It's not just /etc/hosts that
needs to be setup for properly configued fqdn. It is a bit different
between different Linux flavors and even version of flavors as well. For
example, Ubuntu/Debian and CentOS 7 also make use of /etc/ hostname whereas
After trying to learn Ansible for the past few days the most glaring
problem I have run into is documentation inconsistency.
Ansible has evolved rapidly and all the documentation says "since v1.x you
can now do this and this" sort of thing. Also some newer things are not
backwards compatible s
I am leaning Ansible but it's close.
Looking for peoples opinions.
So far I prefer Ansible's serverless design doing everything over ssh with
keys. I tries salt-ssh but it's quite rudimentary in comparison. If
salt-ssh let me use pillars data instead of a roster file to access
servers it
