Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/script ant.bat

Conor MacNeill wrote: Steve Loughran wrote: ... I'm more inclined to move the lcp functionality into Java and build a classloader in there to launch Ant. I have come close to this before (and indeed Mutant did this), so I will give it a go, between bugs. That said, a native launcher does have so

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/script ant.bat

Steve Loughran wrote: I wonder what they will do to people's env variables? Maybe we need to put together a java runner exe. This is something I've been wondering about for a while; jakarta-commons would be the place. Something to take a file declaring jvm opts, pattern for the classpath, etc, and

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/script ant.bat

- Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 22:48 Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/script ant.bat > > And JDK 1.1 too :-) > yeah, I was jus

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/script ant.bat

Steve Loughran wrote: There has been some ant-user discussion about win9x boxes not having SystemDrive defined. Is this the case? The fact that it is a mixed-case variable hints that it is an NT value. Yes, it is not defined but that does not affect the script at all so no problem. The real proble

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/script ant.bat

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 21:34 Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/script ant.bat > conor 2003/02/01 21:34:21 > > Modified:src/script ant.bat > Log: > Fix ant.bat for Win95/98/ME users - chec

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/script ant.bat

- Original Message - From: "Stephane Bailliez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 4:00 PM Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/script ant.bat > - Original Message - > Fr

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/script ant.bat

- Original Message - From: "Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I still see this; i need to go back to 1.1.8 for things to work [...] uh ? what kind of jdk do you have that has only 4 exe (w/o java and javac) in bin directory ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/script ant.bat

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 12:23 PM Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/script ant.bat > sbailliez2002/08/22 12:23:33 > > Modified:src/script ant.bat > Log: > More batch hacking. JAVACMD was reset

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/script ant.bat

Conor MacNeill wrote: > > Bill, > > I don't mind. It depends on whether we feel the antrc_* scripts can make > non-local changes to the environment. As it stands they have that > possibility. They could have their own setlocal/endlocal if desired. If we > moved endlocal, the setlocal must be move

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/script ant.bat

ughts? -- Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cortex eBusiness http://www.cortexebusiness.com.au > -Original Message- > From: Bill Burton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 30 January 2001 3:37 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/script an

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/script ant.bat

Hi Conor, Thanks for applying my patch. Wouldn't the endlocal you added be better at the end of the file? Although, I suppose anyone running on NT wouldn't need to call the antrc_post.bat file anyway so it probably doesn't matter. -Bill Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > +if not "%OS%"==