Re: scp task

2001-08-09 Thread Cedric Berger
Richard Emberson wrote: > Cedric Berger wrote: > > > > > Then try to setup RSA authentication: you don't need password! > > > > you will very soon enjoy it! > > > > Cedric > > > > > > Well, we are secure ... we all have RSA passphr

Re: scp task

2001-08-09 Thread Cedric Berger
> > Then try to setup RSA authentication: you don't need password! > > you will very soon enjoy it! > > Cedric > > Well, we are secure ... we all have RSA passphrases ... so still need to enter RSA passphrases? What the heck is this new beast? Cedric > > text into a running ant task. > > secure

Re: scp task

2001-08-09 Thread Cedric Berger
Richard Emberson wrote: > I saw that there was an optional FTP task. Is there an ssh secure copy task > > out there. Even within our development environment FTP is disabled (a > good thing) which means to move files cross machine I need scp. > > I tried to wrap scp with 'apply' but I guess I/O is

Re: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ?

2001-08-08 Thread Cedric Berger
Conor MacNeill wrote: > From: "Cedric Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > My biggest file name has 40 characters. > > > > Cedric, just to be clear, here we mean the total path name, not just the > filename component. > > Conor Ok, here is the

Re: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ?

2001-08-08 Thread Cedric Berger
Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > Unfortunately, there is still a little glitch with the tar file... > > - I *cannot* extract it on OpenBSD 2.9. > > I think this is because you have filenames with more than 100 > characters in them, see the documentation of the longfile attribute of > . My biggest file

Re: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ?

2001-08-07 Thread Cedric Berger
Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Mon, 06 Aug 2001, Cedric Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > > >>The include pattern is supposed to be relative to the dir attribute > >> > > This is not what the example in the

Re: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ?

2001-08-06 Thread Cedric Berger
Hi Stefan: Stefan Bodewig wrote: >There are bugs in Ant 1.3's tarfilest, but what you see is expected >behavior: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >The include pattern is supposed to be relative to the dir attribute - > This is not what the example in the documentation shows

Re: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ?

2001-08-06 Thread Cedric Berger
Conor MacNeill wrote: > Try a recent nightly build. All of this has been fixed, I believe. I don't think so. The documentation has been fixed, but the (buggy) behavior is still the same. Cedric