Re: [POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

Hi Jeff, On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 09:45:22 +1100, Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >So can I add "the build >system formerly known as Jeff's"? ;) To the attic, yes. ;-) Suggestion: 1. to deal with the "old" stuff, I suggest that you add your files to the repository and the deployables as ano

Re: [POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 04:31:23PM +0100, Rolf Katzenberger wrote: [..] > >When someone adopts and improves the 'no-frills' project at the expense > >of some additional build.xml complexity, what happens? Can they submit > >their modified build system? > > > >How about as a policy, we agree to ac

Re: [POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Rolf Katzenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to say that they're a bit ...ummm... small. No offense taken, they live from user contributions. > Anyway, if patches to xdocs/faq.xml are the desired way to > contribute, I'll do so. How about *mentioning* this way on

Re: [POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

Hi Stefan, On 22 Nov 2001 16:38:56 +0100, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip; on Ant FAQs:] >See the top of - any >contributions to Ant's own FAQ (which we keep in Ant's CVS and at the >website) is more than welcome. Patches to xdocs/f

Re: [POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Rolf Katzenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just depends how many maintainers such a project can attract. Assume > a minor change in the no-frills root implying an avalanche of > follow-up changes (e.g., renaming due to discovery of a truly > ingenious naming scheme). Ant

Re: [POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

Hi Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 10:16:06 +1100, Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 06:14:42PM +0100, Rolf Katzenberger wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:22:42 +1100, Jeff Turner >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> [snip; Rolf:] >> >> Well... u

Re: [POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 10:22:22AM +1100, Peter Donald wrote: > Hi, > > sounds good but I have a request. Could you call these recipies and not > templates? Already the term template is used to mean something completely > different in context of Ant2. Then it sounds like you've chosen an overl

Re: [POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

Hi, sounds good but I have a request. Could you call these recipies and not templates? Already the term template is used to mean something completely different in context of Ant2. -- Cheers, Pete -- Mark Twain: "In the real world, the rig

Re: [POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 06:14:42PM +0100, Rolf Katzenberger wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:22:42 +1100, Jeff Turner > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [snip; Rolf:] > >> Well... ummm... :o) I already started such a sourceforge project a > >> while ago, Ant Heap (http://sourceforge.net/projects/ant

Re: [POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:22:42 +1100, Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] >There >is one useful trick here: declare a 'main' target which is the default, and >then call others from that. Then you can have build.properties declare it's >default target ('jar' in most projects, 'dist' in ot

Re: [POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 06:08:14PM +0100, Rolf Katzenberger wrote: > Hello Jeff, > > On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:36:39 +1100, Jeff Turner > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I was wondering, how do people feel about developing "common", > >"universal", "generic" build.xml scripts for common needs? > >

Re: [POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

Hello Jeff, On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:36:39 +1100, Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I was wondering, how do people feel about developing "common", >"universal", "generic" build.xml scripts for common needs? > >I have hordes of mini-projects on the go, the end result of each is: > - a jar fil

Re: [POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

> Of interest: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-commons-sandbox/cjan/ okay, this is far better than my hasty idea :) i look forward to it. leon. -- money is the root of all money. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

Jeff Turner wrote: >Hi, > >I was wondering, how do people feel about developing "common", >"universal", "generic" build.xml scripts for common needs? > >I have hordes of mini-projects on the go, the end result of each is: > - a jar file > - some javadocs > - some config files > - the above all pa

Re: [POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

Of interest: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-commons-sandbox/cjan/ > one addition i'd want: > > 'fetch-build-depends' > - download application build dependencies > used Debian Linux's apt-get build? the > very same idea. > > the reas

Re: [POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

Good Idea. Here I was trying to get folk who'd been mostly doing everything with batch files up to speed on ant etc and I wrote a sample project based on the Jakarta Struts 'blank' sample and the structure described in the TADG (Tomcat Application Developer's Guide - http://jakarta.apache.org

Re: [POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 12:47:45PM +0200, Leon Breedt wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 09:36:39PM +1100, Jeff Turner wrote: > > I was wondering, how do people feel about developing "common", > > "universal", "generic" build.xml scripts for common needs? > i've had this exact need. > > > My very f

Re: [POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 09:36:39PM +1100, Jeff Turner wrote: > I was wondering, how do people feel about developing "common", > "universal", "generic" build.xml scripts for common needs? i've had this exact need. > My very first build.xml was copied from an Apache project, and hacked to > meet my

[POLL] jakarta-ant-templates (Generic Ant-based project templates)

Hi, I was wondering, how do people feel about developing "common", "universal", "generic" build.xml scripts for common needs? I have hordes of mini-projects on the go, the end result of each is: - a jar file - some javadocs - some config files - the above all packaged as a .tar.gz and .zip