On 12/20/00 1:46 PM, "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ant's general philosohpy to date has been to fail quickly. If there is some
> problem, Ant does not try to limp along. You fix it and build again. If you
> want that changed, it would be best to get involved in the Ant-Dev
> discu
Hi Dave,
Ant doesn't have anything like make -k letting you continue despite
errors.
If you are really stuck and willing to hack the code a bit, the class
taskdefs/Ant.java which implements could be modified to take a
new attribute failonerror (like the exec task) where the default is true.
Wh
David,
Ant's general philosohpy to date has been to fail quickly. If there is some
problem, Ant does not try to limp along. You fix it and build again. If you
want that changed, it would be best to get involved in the Ant-Dev
discussions about Ant's future direction.
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Howdy.
I'm building my way down a directory tree using build.xml files in every
subdirectory and a chain of tasks in each build.xml. I believe
I have to do it this way because certain subdirectories need special handling,
and I only want to make changes (when they are necessary) in a single