Conor MacNeill wrote:
> From: "Cedric Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > My biggest file name has 40 characters.
> >
>
> Cedric, just to be clear, here we mean the total path name, not just the
> filename component.
>
> Conor
Ok, here is the result of "tar tf http-proxy.tar" on an OpenBSD 2.9 b
From: "Cedric Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> My biggest file name has 40 characters.
>
Cedric, just to be clear, here we mean the total path name, not just the
filename component.
Conor
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> > Unfortunately, there is still a little glitch with the tar file...
> > - I *cannot* extract it on OpenBSD 2.9.
>
> I think this is because you have filenames with more than 100
> characters in them, see the documentation of the longfile attribute of
> .
My biggest file
On Tue, 07 Aug 2001, Cedric Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Anyway, the tar + gzip file is created correctly with the latest
> snapshot!
Great.
> Unfortunately, there is still a little glitch with the tar file...
> - I *cannot* extract it on OpenBSD 2.9.
I think this is because you have fi
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Aug 2001, Cedric Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> >
> >>The include pattern is supposed to be relative to the dir attribute
> >>
> > This is not what the example in the documentation shows.
>
> Not true, but it is a bit obfuscate
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 12:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ?
>
>
> Hi Stefan:
>
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> >There are bugs in Ant 1.3's tarfiles
On Mon, 06 Aug 2001, Cedric Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>>The include pattern is supposed to be relative to the dir attribute
>>
> This is not what the example in the documentation shows.
Not true, but it is a bit obfuscated (the dir is dist.name/.., so
dist.name
Hi Stefan:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>There are bugs in Ant 1.3's tarfilest, but what you see is expected
>behavior:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>The include pattern is supposed to be relative to the dir attribute -
>
This is not what the example in the documentation shows
There are bugs in Ant 1.3's tarfilest, but what you see is expected
behavior:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
The include pattern is supposed to be relative to the dir attribute -
Ant doesn't find any files and therefore assumes the archive is
up-to-date.
Make that
Conor MacNeill wrote:
> Try a recent nightly build. All of this has been fixed, I believe.
I don't think so.
The documentation has been fixed, but the (buggy) behavior is still the same.
Cedric
Try a recent nightly build. All of this has been fixed, I believe.
Thanks
Conor
- Original Message -
From: "Cedric Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 9:34 AM
Subject: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ?
> Hi,
&g
11 matches
Mail list logo