Re: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ?

2001-08-08 Thread Cedric Berger
Conor MacNeill wrote: > From: "Cedric Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > My biggest file name has 40 characters. > > > > Cedric, just to be clear, here we mean the total path name, not just the > filename component. > > Conor Ok, here is the result of "tar tf http-proxy.tar" on an OpenBSD 2.9 b

Re: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ?

2001-08-08 Thread Conor MacNeill
From: "Cedric Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > My biggest file name has 40 characters. > Cedric, just to be clear, here we mean the total path name, not just the filename component. Conor

Re: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ?

2001-08-08 Thread Cedric Berger
Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > Unfortunately, there is still a little glitch with the tar file... > > - I *cannot* extract it on OpenBSD 2.9. > > I think this is because you have filenames with more than 100 > characters in them, see the documentation of the longfile attribute of > . My biggest file

Re: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ?

2001-08-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 07 Aug 2001, Cedric Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyway, the tar + gzip file is created correctly with the latest > snapshot! Great. > Unfortunately, there is still a little glitch with the tar file... > - I *cannot* extract it on OpenBSD 2.9. I think this is because you have fi

Re: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ?

2001-08-07 Thread Cedric Berger
Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Mon, 06 Aug 2001, Cedric Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > > >>The include pattern is supposed to be relative to the dir attribute > >> > > This is not what the example in the documentation shows. > > Not true, but it is a bit obfuscate

RE: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ?

2001-08-07 Thread Jason Rogers
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 12:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ? > > > Hi Stefan: > > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > >There are bugs in Ant 1.3's tarfiles

Re: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ?

2001-08-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 06 Aug 2001, Cedric Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >>The include pattern is supposed to be relative to the dir attribute >> > This is not what the example in the documentation shows. Not true, but it is a bit obfuscated (the dir is dist.name/.., so dist.name

Re: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ?

2001-08-06 Thread Cedric Berger
Hi Stefan: Stefan Bodewig wrote: >There are bugs in Ant 1.3's tarfilest, but what you see is expected >behavior: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >The include pattern is supposed to be relative to the dir attribute - > This is not what the example in the documentation shows

Re: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ?

2001-08-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig
There are bugs in Ant 1.3's tarfilest, but what you see is expected behavior: > > > > > > > > The include pattern is supposed to be relative to the dir attribute - Ant doesn't find any files and therefore assumes the archive is up-to-date. Make that

Re: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ?

2001-08-06 Thread Cedric Berger
Conor MacNeill wrote: > Try a recent nightly build. All of this has been fixed, I believe. I don't think so. The documentation has been fixed, but the (buggy) behavior is still the same. Cedric

Re: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ?

2001-08-04 Thread Conor MacNeill
Try a recent nightly build. All of this has been fixed, I believe. Thanks Conor - Original Message - From: "Cedric Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 9:34 AM Subject: Tar/Tarfileset broken on Ant 1.3 ? > Hi, &g