Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] RIPE NCC to set abuse-c for remaining organisation with ASNs or other resources allocated or assigned by the RIPE NCC

2016-02-19 Thread Brian Nisbet
On 19/02/2016 09:50, Edward Shryane wrote: On 19 Feb 2016, at 10:46, Brian Nisbet wrote: Tim, On 14/01/2016 14:57, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote: Hi all, On 12 Jan 2016, at 15:23, Brian Nisbet wrote: Afternoon(-ish), As I'm pretty sure Monday is now everywhere in the world, I think that give

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] RIPE NCC to set abuse-c for remaining organisation with ASNs or other resources allocated or assigned by the RIPE NCC

2016-02-19 Thread Edward Shryane
> On 19 Feb 2016, at 10:46, Brian Nisbet wrote: > > Tim, > > On 14/01/2016 14:57, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> >> >>> On 12 Jan 2016, at 15:23, Brian Nisbet wrote: >>> >>> Afternoon(-ish), >>> >>> As I'm pretty sure Monday is now everywhere in the world, I think that >>> given

[anti-abuse-wg] Reminder: 2016-01 New Policy Proposal (Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the Abuse-c Policy)

2016-02-19 Thread Brian Nisbet
Colleagues, We're now a week away from the end of the initial discussion phase on 2016-01 and things have been a little quiet here of late. The Chairs would greatly appreciate more opinions and/or discussion of the policy and/or some of the specific suggested approaches. You can find the (ve

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] RIPE NCC to set abuse-c for remaining organisation with ASNs or other resources allocated or assigned by the RIPE NCC

2016-02-19 Thread Brian Nisbet
Tim, On 14/01/2016 14:57, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote: Hi all, On 12 Jan 2016, at 15:23, Brian Nisbet wrote: Afternoon(-ish), As I'm pretty sure Monday is now everywhere in the world, I think that given the lack of further responses or discussion or, importantly, disagreements with the genera