Hi,
I apologise for my recent poor behavior and my use of profanity
(specifically the word "bullshit") - I have grown much less tolerant of
large tech and as society is losing this war anyway, it is causing me
enormous amounts of stress. When innocent things happen that contribute
negatively to
anushah,
next study: distribution of operator reactions to a simple request
of an academic study questionnaire :)
uncloak: the work icsi does is a couple decade trail of operationally
relevant awesomeness. so, though i loathe survey quetionnaires, i
answered directly as appended. i
In message , Anushah Hossain writes
>>surprisingly, I haven't seen the request on any other lists that
>are (a)
>relevant and (b) open -- perhaps they and their project team are
>not
>especially well connected in this space :(
>
>This is true. We were advised to share
In message , ac writes
>Mostly, what makes me very angry is the audacity
this does seem a reasonable list to ask for assistance on ... but being
around to answer questions promptly would be appropriately polite
surprisingly, I haven't seen the request on any other lists that are (a)
relevant
On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 09:02:01 +0200
Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> * ac [2019-07-18 08:29]:
> > It is about: "evaluating and improving the accuracy of blacklists."
> > The entire post is arrogant, obnoxious, offensive and inaccurate
> > and is an oxymoron.
>
> Tbh the only mails I get this vibe
* ac [2019-07-18 08:29]:
> It is about: "evaluating and improving the accuracy of blacklists."
>
> The entire post is arrogant, obnoxious, offensive and inaccurate and is
> an oxymoron.
Tbh the only mails I get this vibe from in this thread are yours.
Could you tune it down a bit? There is no
The person seems to be real:
https://erg.berkeley.edu/people/hossain-anushah/
On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 08:03:38 +0200
Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
> Hi Andreas
> I echo Barry's views on the research.
> Some valid points, but it's a pity that you tend to void them by
> mostly telling others that they are stupid.
> I like your idea about studying why certain practices
The only organisation that is in a prime position to implement any meaningful
blacklist is a RIR like RIPE itself. Anything less than RIR level blacklisting
is what is known as "whac a mole"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whac-A-Mole
But, as it comes down to time and money, the likes of which
In article
you write:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Hi everyone,
>
>I'm a researcher at UC Berkeley and the International Computer Science
>Institute. My colleagues and I are working on evaluating and improving the
>accuracy of blacklists.
I looked at the survey and I don't understand what you mean by
Hi Andreas
I echo Barry's views on the research.
Some valid points, but it's a pity that you tend to void them by mostly
telling others that they are stupid.
I like your idea about studying why certain practices occur. So why not
find a University that is interested in starting a project on
11 matches
Mail list logo
