> On 1 Nov 2023, at 13:56, John Levine wrote:
>
> It appears that à ngel Gonzalez Berdasco via anti-abuse-wg
> said:
>>> Just block their network 80.94.95.0/24 and forget about it.
>
>> organisation: ORG-BA1515-RIPE
>> org-name: BtHoster LTD
>> country:GB
>> org-type: O
Peter
Economic incentives make a lot of sense. In the domain space we’ve seen
registries offering promotions that are linked to a registrar’s “rating” and it
seems to work.
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
https://www.blacknight.com/
htt
Moin,
On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 02:37:27PM -0700, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> Sure, but that's a membership decision and not a community decision.
this perceived disconnect is a re-occuring scheme and therefore
deserves a bit more thought, albeit not in this WG but likely
in NCC Services and/or Address Po
Just to give a feedback:
Yesterday I had complained about the said IP 80.94.95.181 also to RIPE NCC
via their WebMail contact page, which went to supp...@ripe.net
and opened a ticket: https://www.ripe.net/contact-form
Luckily the worst hacking attempts originating from these IPs
finally have sto
Gert
I think a lot of us were not going to accept ANY changes to the charging scheme
that time round.
Anyway .. history now ..
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
https://www.blacknight.com/
https://blacknight.blog/
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 09:29:52AM +, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
> The ASN cost for us would have had practically no impact ? we only have two
> and I suspect we?re getting rid of one at some point.
>
> However the other costs that the charging schemes suggested would have cost
Gert
The ASN cost for us would have had practically no impact – we only have two and
I suspect we’re getting rid of one at some point.
However the other costs that the charging schemes suggested would have cost us
thousands – and that simply wasn’t acceptable
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Bla
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 09:19:13AM +, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
> That?s a massive over simplification of what happened.
>
> The NCC proposed a number of charging schemes which *included* charges per
> ASN. The proposal was rejected by the majority of the members who voted
> be
Gert
That’s a massive over simplification of what happened.
The NCC proposed a number of charging schemes which *included* charges per ASN.
The proposal was rejected by the majority of the members who voted because the
changes would have cost a lot of us significantly more than what we currentl
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 09:21:01AM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote:
> (*) I guess? I admit to never having read the details of how charging is
> set, since I have never represented a RIPE NCC member.
members vote at the RIPE AGM, to select one out of a number of possible
charging schemes proposed by
Leo,
On 01/11/2023 22.37, Leo Vegoda wrote:
On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 14:26, Gert Doering wrote:
On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 01:45:03PM -0700, Leo Vegoda wrote:
The RIPE NCC periodically asks the community about the priority for
cleaning up unused ASNs, e.g.
- https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/w
11 matches
Mail list logo
