Greetings friends,
I though that you all might like to be aware of this:
https://apnews.com/article/technology-business-government-and-politics-b26ab809d1e9fdb53314f56299399949
Regards,
rfg
ripe.net ; anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: [anti-abuse-wg] AS8003 and U.S. Department of Defense routing
CAUTION[External]: This email originated from outside of the organisation. Do
not click on links or open the attachments unless you recognise the sender and
know the content is safe.
Greeti
interesting wg to do routing security analysis.
as i do really not know the dod's or their proxy's motive(s), i can not
say much about their tactics let alone strategy.
i do know, and have actually seen and experienced, part of 11/8 being
used as if it was 1918 space; ripe bologna was the first t
bject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] AS8003 and U.S. Department of Defense routing
CAUTION[External]: This email originated from outside of the organisation. Do
not click on links or open the attachments unless you recognise the sender and
know the content is safe.
interesting wg to do routing security
[ brian lured me into the abuse circle; so reposting with routing ]
interesting wg to do routing security analysis.
as i do really not know the dod's or their proxy's motive(s), i can not
say much about their tactics let alone strategy.
i do know, and have actually seen and experienced, part of
In message ,
Randy Bush wrote:
>interesting wg to do routing security analysis.
To be 100% clear, it was not my intention that anyone here should attempt
to engage in any sort of "security analysis" with respect to the current
rather inexplicable routing for much DoD IPv4 address space. I just
