Re: [AOLSERVER] Monitoring setups

2004-09-09 Thread Chris Davies
we use http://bigsister.graeff.com/ and have been testing http://www.zabbix.com/ both have extendable agents and can be customized quite a bit. On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 14:11 -0400, Alfred Werner wrote: > General Query - > > What are people using to monitor running AOLserver instances? I am -- AOL

Re: [AOLSERVER] Progress report

2004-08-18 Thread Chris Davies
tent-Type: text/html Content-Length: 547 Connection: close Connection closed by foreign host. Not everyone follows the RFCs. :) On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 13:55 -0400, Noah Robin wrote: > On Aug 18, 2004, at 1:09 PM, Chris Davies wrote: > > > > > It seems that a HEAD request is still pro

Re: [AOLSERVER] Progress report

2004-08-18 Thread Chris Davies
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 09:22 -0400, Janine Sisk wrote: > Based on suggestions here, I set minthreads to 10 and threadtimeout to > 3600. Maxthreads was already set to 10, so I left it alone. You mention OpenACS -- I had a server that got bogged down tremendously the other day when it got hit with a

Re: [AOLSERVER] Strange behavior from nsd 3.3

2004-07-21 Thread Chris Davies
On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 14:59 -0400, Janine Sisk wrote: > I just discovered a site doing this old thing, where the error log is > full of > > [21/Jul/2004:14:53:19][24118.8192][-main-] Fatal: unix: kill(1235, 15) > failed: 'Operation not permitted' what uid/gid owns the pid file? is it possible daem

Re: [AOLSERVER] problems with aolserver and php

2004-06-18 Thread Chris Davies
Do you have Zend Optimizer installed? Are you running non-compiled code? if so, try zend_optimizer.optimization_level=0 in your php.ini On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 19:14 +0300, Cristian Andrei Calin wrote: > Well, I've been trying to identify the lines of code that cause the problems, so far > I c

Re: [AOLSERVER] Vhosting

2004-05-07 Thread Chris Davies
On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 15:26, Dossy wrote: > On 2004.05.07, Bas Scheffers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dossy said: > > > AOLserver 4.0 has virtual servers built-in. For some documentation how > > > to set it up, start here: just out of curiosity, does it make sense to run multiple ports in one c

Re: [AOLSERVER] nsopenssl: permission denied

2004-05-03 Thread Chris Davies
On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 15:32, Scott Goodwin wrote: > It's not a threading issue. AOLserver 4.x opens the listen sockets for > all comm modules including nsopenssl, and the error message is coming > from the DriverThread function in nsd/driver.c when it attempts to > start listening on the port. The

Re: [AOLSERVER] nsopenssl: permission denied

2004-05-02 Thread Chris Davies
I had a very very similar problem. ns_param maxthreads 5 ns_param minthreads 5 with minthreads 0, (and sometimes 1 or 2) it exhibited the same behavior. On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 02:02, Bart Teeuwisse wrote: > Notice: prebind: bound: 192.168.1.2:80 > Notice: prebind: bound: 192.1

Re: [AOLSERVER] Anyone noticing weirdness with MSIE 6.0 and HTTPS requests?

2004-04-13 Thread Chris Davies
for apache, we've never run keepalives and SSL due to problems. The theory was: Surfer hits page, surfer fills in form info, keepalive idles at 30 seconds, IE believes the session is still there, surfer hits submit, invalid ssl session, blank page, surfer needs to refresh to see page, all post in

Re: [AOLSERVER] Binding to port 80

2004-02-15 Thread Chris Davies
I believe it is a -B capital B and I don't recall if it needed to be the last option. On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 01:23, Taguchi Takeshi wrote: > and I got "Permission denied" errors... -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [AOLSERVER] Binding to port 80

2004-02-15 Thread Chris Davies
I think you're missing the -b parameter -b 1.2.3.4:80 needs to be on the command line, but there might be some specific order, I don't recall specifically. On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 20:52, Taguchi, Takeshi wrote: > Hi,all. > > I've try to bind aolserver 4.1 to port 80, but I've got > "permission den

Re: [AOLSERVER] nspostgres.so with AOLserver 4.0

2004-01-09 Thread Chris Davies
maybe ns_param nsdb ${bindir}/nsdb.so On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 16:10, Nathaniel H wrote: > I'm trying to get postgres working with AOLserver 4.0. -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the body of "SIGNOFF

Re: [AOLSERVER] nsd and memory leaks

2004-01-08 Thread Chris Davies
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 21:33, John Shafto wrote: > > > I was running nsd v.3.4.2 on a fairly active website > > > (FreeBSD 4.x os) for a few weeks and had some > > > trouble with the nsd process growing. I was restarting > > > the process every few days as it grew to 40-60Mb. > > > > 40-60MB is no

Re: [AOLSERVER] file descriptor limit

2003-12-29 Thread Chris Davies
mine always hangs in schedule_timeout as reported in /proc/pid/wchan On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 17:55, Manish Mukherjee wrote: > hi all, > > i'm running aolserver 4, and it keeps randomly crashing. unfortunately, > when it crashes, nothing helpful appears in any logs. the server is -- AOLserver

Re: [AOLSERVER] Ns_SetRequestAuthorizeProc has no Tcl Command

2003-10-31 Thread Chris Davies
How about an authentication plugin structure that would allow one to load their own authentication method. HTTP-Auth against a database, HTTP-Auth against a flat-file, HTTP-Auth against LDAP, etc. Digest, Certificate, Session Auth, etc. At least in the long run, it would be much more flexible.

Re: [AOLSERVER] My posts are failing to be uh, posted. (posted directly through listserv and not via email)

2003-08-27 Thread Chris Davies
probably getting a bit off topic here. On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 23:04, Dossy wrote: > I've been thinking this might be a good way to stop mail header > forgeries (which most spam falls into the category of) but would annoy a > lot of people ... > > Upon receipt of mail at the end of the DATA portion

Re: [AOLSERVER] My posts are failing to be uh, posted. (posted directly through listserv and not via email)

2003-08-26 Thread Chris Davies
the theory is that if there is no reverse lookup, it is a poorly maintained ISP's netblock and most spam originates from poorly maintained ISPs. So, in order to slow spam, one of the simple things is to do a reverse lookup to see if the machine is configured properly -- and give a temporary error