Without having any real metrics, the performance jump from Solaris 2.6 to 7
has been enormous. It's also much better in terms of the separation of the
thread library (which is why Solaris 7 binaries don't run on Solaris 2.6)
and sundry LWP changes that are not insignificant. You should be able
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 02:28:28 -0500, Michael Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...the AOL team uses Solaris 2.6 as a test environment. The burning question
uppermost in my mind (save one) is HOW DIFFERENT COULD IT BE?!?!?!?
I can't really say what is different about it except for some truly major
Kriston Rehberg wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 02:28:28 -0500, Michael Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...the AOL team uses Solaris 2.6 as a test environment. The burning
question
uppermost in my mind (save one) is HOW DIFFERENT COULD IT BE?!?!?!?
I can't really say what is different about it
Jeff Hobbs wrote:
[stuff]
Kriston Rehberg wrote:
[stuff]
I might add that you will have a hard time getting a compiler and/or
support for 2.5.1 from Sun nowadays. They want this to disappear, and
all I can say is that they have good reason. People should be on the
2.6+ for better stability,
I've compiled AS3.4.2 on Solaris 2.5.1 successfully, but upon attempting
to start it, I'm getting a relocation error:
Warning: modload: failed to load '/usr/local/aolserver/bin/nssock.so': 'ld.so.1:
bin/nsd76: fatal: relocation error: symbol not found: Ns_RegisterDriver: referenced in
Well, I figured this one out, actually -- after roughly eight hours of
reading the entire Internet, I discovered that -Wl,-E is required as a
ld flag in order to export all the symbols in the main program so that
nssock.so can use them. ... Is this obsolete 2.5.1 behavior that
Solaris 2.6 has
