]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:45 AM
To: AOLserver Discussion
Subject: RE: [AOLSERVER] segmentation violation: gdb stack trace WAS RE:
[AOLSERVER] Trying to debug a C module?
Did a trace with a break on __libc_malloc and __libc_free.
Noticed that not 100% of the calls that I traced for a while
pbm statement. Otherwise, it occurs
on 1.
-Original Message-
From: AOLserver Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Rob Mayoff
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] segmentation violation: gdb stack trace WAS RE:
[AOLSERVER
Of Sanjivendra Nath
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] segmentation violation: gdb stack trace WAS RE:
[AOLSERVER] Trying to debug a C module?
Yes, very reliably, every time. Same place, same stack trace.
In fact, if I change the adp source from:
1
At 10:37 AM 10/25/2001 -0500, you wrote:
Do you run nsd with the -z flag? If not, then it shouldn't matter.
Does it have to be compiled differently to enable the -z flag? or is there
some other part of the -z parameter (other than just -z) ... every time I
try to enable it on my server it
+-- On Oct 25, Patrick Spence said:
Does it have to be compiled differently to enable the -z flag?
No.
every time I
try to enable it on my server it prevents it from loading..
Tell us exactly what you did and exactly what the computer did.
At 11:29 AM 10/25/2001 -0500, you wrote:
+-- On Oct 25, Patrick Spence said:
Does it have to be compiled differently to enable the -z flag?
No.
every time I
try to enable it on my server it prevents it from loading..
Tell us exactly what you did and exactly what the computer did.
+-- On Oct 24, Sanjivendra Nath said:
Why would a malloc(10 bytes) cause a segmentation violation?
Because the heap has been corrupted. Perhaps something called free
twice on the same block, or wrote past the end of a block.
