El dc 07 de 11 de 2012 a les 08:19 +0100, en/na Per Tunedal va escriure:
Hi,
it would be interesting to test compounded words. How do I proceed?
I'm training on the pair Swedish (se) - Danish (da) before attacking
Norwegian (no) - Swedish (se). Compounded words are very frequent in the
Hi Per
just a littke comment:
Swedish is sv, not se. We use ISO 639 language codes.
It is correct that the ISO 3166 country code for Sweden is SE,
but that is not for the language. For example in Finland they
also speak some Swedish, and still the language code is sv for this.
Best regards
Oops! I did it again. I know this perfectly well, but just the same I
have done the same error twice recently ...
Shame on me!
Yours,
Per Tunedal
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012, at 13:23, k...@keldix.com wrote:
Hi Per
just a littke comment:
Swedish is sv, not se. We use ISO 639 language codes.
It
Hi,
thank you. I've read the Wiki and looked into the apertium-nn-nb.nb.dix
file.
Apparently, this is solved in a less transparent way in the nn-nb pair
than in the examples in the Wiki. In the beginning of the dictionary,
there are a lot of pardefs treating compounds, that I don't understand.
El dc 07 de 11 de 2012 a les 17:32 +0100, en/na Per Tunedal va escriure:
Hi,
thank you. I've read the Wiki and looked into the apertium-nn-nb.nb.dix
file.
Apparently, this is solved in a less transparent way in the nn-nb pair
than in the examples in the Wiki.
It's less transparent because
Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com writes:
El dc 07 de 11 de 2012 a les 17:32 +0100, en/na Per Tunedal va escriure:
Hi,
thank you. I've read the Wiki and looked into the apertium-nn-nb.nb.dix
file.
Apparently, this is solved in a less transparent way in the nn-nb pair
than in the examples
