Re: [Apertium-stuff] Further Idea for GSOC: it-eo language pair with morphosyntactic tree for disambiguation

2013-03-19 Thread Federico Gobbo
Hi Francis, I don't really understand how the Constructive Adpositional Grammar works. That's our task :) We will you show to you all in practice. Perhaps you could try a small toy implementation for example, using the Where is James? story to demonstrate the approach you would take. Yeah,

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Further Idea for GSOC: it-eo language pair with morphosyntactic tree for disambiguation

2013-03-19 Thread Francis Tyers
El dt 19 de 03 de 2013 a les 07:26 +0100, en/na Federico Gobbo va escriure: Hi Francis, I don't really understand how the Constructive Adpositional Grammar works. That's our task :) We will you show to you all in practice. Perhaps you could try a small toy implementation for example,

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Apertium in android

2013-03-19 Thread karunakar medamoni
Hello Jacob. Here am using lttoolbox 3.2 version. Let me know the current version of lttoolbox-java jar file. Thanks Regards M. Karunakar University of Hyderabad,Hyd, 9491388035. On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:33 AM, Jacob Nordfalk jacob.nordf...@gmail.comwrote: 2013/3/18 Jimmy O'Regan

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Apertium in android

2013-03-19 Thread Jacob Nordfalk
I am sorry, but '3.2' is a very wide statement, as lttoolbox-java has more or less always been in version 3.2 :-) We should really do a new release, both of Java and C version and bump both version numbers up to 3.3. Meanwhile, please use the SVN version, it is stable and fine. Jacob 2013/3/19

[Apertium-stuff] Idea for GSOC: tools to train supervised taggers

2013-03-19 Thread Gema Ramírez-Sánchez
Hi there, as I see it, there is a need in Apertium for most released pairs and the ones to come: better PoS taggers. In my experience, training supervised taggers has never been a waste of time but all the opposite: at the same time we have quality improvement and we are creating unvaluable

Re: [Apertium-stuff] New tool for DixTools

2013-03-19 Thread Gema Ramírez-Sánchez
Nice, really nice for newcomers, thanks Xavi. If you plan to go ahead refining it, remember that, at least in Spanish, in a regular .dix dictionary, most verbs are represented by two entries. For example, for procastinar, the enhance tool currently adds: e lm=procastinar iprocastin/ipar

Re: [Apertium-stuff] New tool for DixTools

2013-03-19 Thread Mikel Forcada
Al 03/19/2013 04:25 PM, En/na Gema Ramírez-Sánchez ha escrit: e lm=procastinar iprocastin/ipar n=abandon/ar__vblex//e No era procrastinar? Mikel -- Mikel L. Forcada (http://www.dlsi.ua.es/~mlf/) Departament de Llenguatges i Sistemes Informàtics Universitat d'Alacant E-03071 Alacant, Spain

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Idea for GSOC: tools to train supervised taggers

2013-03-19 Thread Mikel Forcada
+1 Write it up, Gema! ;-) You'll mentor it with a co-mentor (!) I can easily think of a couple names Mikel Al 03/19/2013 01:49 PM, En/na Gema Ramírez-Sánchez ha escrit: Hi there, as I see it, there is a need in Apertium for most released pairs and the ones to come: better PoS